 | | Hendo...
|
|
Hendo, I am unaware of where you are, what you're doing, how you're doing, etc. so this post is not a rush, merely a question. Have you looked over the poll page I made and emailed to you? Also, any Valyance/whatever emails being sent? Are you (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I didn't notice that. Maybe it would be less confusing if the prefixes were removed and put in parenthesis behind the name, or if they were simply included in the alphabetizing process. I see what you mean about difficulties in (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Location of Blue Nomad being narrowed down (was: Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad)
|
|
The Blue Nomad has been located in New Pacific sector, although the exact location is a matter of urgent investigation. At present it appears that she is lost in the asteroid fields, slowly being ground to fragments. Three Port Block Yards vessels (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote: <snip> (...) Hi Guys, I too was having a browse of the registry the other day and felt much the same way. To me, I think the problem lies in having them all on the one page. If Starship keeps growing (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Andrew Engstrom wrote worthily on enthusiasm for improving the Registry. Mmmmmm. I get this. With 58 ships, the list is always going to be a bit scary. I have tried to list them in the main list in alphabetical order by (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Ship Registry
|
|
Hey all Just a quick observation: The ship registry is filling out nicely, and I'm excited that there are so many ships loping around the galaxy. However, when I'm searching for an individual ship in the list at the top, it can get quite tedious. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Zac Soden wrote: [...] (...) Hmmm, a new sector? With SMUGGLING?! Great! I have a ship that just might find such a place interesting... Anyways, too bad you're de-commissioning your ship. I know you have some great MOCs (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad
|
|
(...) All Port Block Yards vessels and associated vessels have been furnished with a description of the Blue Nomad, and all available information. Beyond listening posts at the perimeter of New Pacific, vessels in many other sectors are on the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Zac Soden wrote about the Blue Nomad, lost in space from the year... Mmmmmm. Wondered what had happenned to you. The authorities in New Pacific were expecting you and then you simply never arrived. This does happen from (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad
|
|
+++ LOCATION UNKNOWN... +++ UNABLE TO CONECT TO NAVIGATIONAL BEACON... +++ TRANSMITTING ON EMERGENY FREQUENCIES... Attention Galactic Mediator! Upon approach to the New Pacific, we experienced some reactor output problems and suffered a minor (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
