Subject:
|
Re: Ship Registry
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.starship
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 05:25:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3394 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote:
<snip>
> In any event, I am waaaaay open to other ways of thinking about this...
Hi Guys,
I too was having a browse of the registry the other day and felt much the same
way. To me, I think the problem lies in having them all on the one page. If
Starship keeps growing the way it has been, that page will take forever to load
in the near future.
My suggestion? Have a seperate web page for each player, which lists all of
their ships with pics and everything. Then, on the main page have two lists -
one of all of the ships in alphabetical order and another with players in
alphabetical order (and the names of their ships with links under). For example:
Ships in alphabetical order:
Enterprise
Jupiter 2
Millennium Falcon
Players in alphabetical order:
Bob:
Enterprise
Milennium Falcon
Jim:
Jupiter 2
I think that this kind of structure would be a lot better, especially as we get
more players. And it would be much easier to navigate (as compared to waiting
for all of the ship pictures to load at once).
So there's my 2 bob bit.
Zac
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ship Registry
|
| In lugnet.gaming.starship, Andrew Engstrom wrote worthily on enthusiasm for improving the Registry. Mmmmmm. I get this. With 58 ships, the list is always going to be a bit scary. I have tried to list them in the main list in alphabetical order by (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
