Subject:
|
Re: My new toy!!! :-)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Jul 2000 04:32:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4758 times
|
| |
|
|
SW = Star Wars, I understand.
I don't know what the numbers Todd posted refer to ( 326-3827.)
Maybe I'm not as big of a SW fan as I thought?
Julie
In lugnet.fun, John J. Ladasky, Jr. writes:
> In lugnet.fun, Julie Krenz writes:
> > Ok, I don't have clue what you guys are talking about,
>
> SW = Star Wars.
>
> > but I found out my
> > inlaws phone number must have been special ordered -
> > 4355.http://www.phonespell.org/
>
> Well, SOMEBODY has to get those numbers! I had a friend whose phone number, • not
> specifically requested, was 566-4355. We used to joke about how much fun it
> would have been if it had been 666-4355. (A Catholic university in the same
> city did have a lot of phone numbers with the 666 prefix. :^)
>
> > Julie
>
> --
> John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.
> Department of Structural Biology
> Stanford University Medical Center
> Stanford, CA 94305
> Secretary, Californians for Renewable Energy <http://www.calfree.com>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My new toy!!! :-)
|
| (...) Watch Episode IV, and listen carefully for the above "phone number", as well as the number 1138 (itself a reference to an earlier George Lucas sci-fi film) mentioned by Eric Joslin. The scary thing is that I have long graduated from the status (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My new toy!!! :-)
|
| (...) SW = Star Wars. (...) specifically requested, was 566-4355. We used to joke about how much fun it would have been if it had been 666-4355. (A Catholic university in the same city did have a lot of phone numbers with the 666 prefix. :^) (...) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
