 | | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G9ssrK.6y9@lugnet.com... (...) Your Welcome. BTW I liked the old one too. (...) not? Not really cause I went straight for the "all in one page". Guess thats not a real answer. :-D (...) (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
(...) Thanks! That's the way it was earlier - I think it was OK, so maybe the whole division is kinda useless. But I suppose it does no harm if I leave the previous option there; so everyone can choose their favored method. And since I already (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
(...) the Find tool in IE to locate that entry on the page. I just tested Find: "TIA" and it went right to it. Fast and easy, all right there. -- Hop-Frog (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
(...) Right. I like it better, too. Which is why I'm wondering if the alphabetical division is helpful at all. Do you (or anyone, for that matter) think it is? (...) Hmmm, good idea! And I can use a single page for all the links. Great! Thanks, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
(...) Glad you liked it! Question: did you feel the division into letters was helpful at all, or not? (...) Not at all! -Shiri (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
Just wanted to tell you I liked it. I liked the "all on one page" part the best. Do you mind if I download it to my pc for offline use? -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. "Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G9r3Ip.44y@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
Hi Shiri: I'd strongly recommend leaving in the 'All entries on one page' option. It's fast enough to bring the whole thing in (at least with a broadband connection) and I'd find it disappointing to click on each letter just to find out that there (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
|
Hi y'all, There was a big storm warning up here today, so I got a chance to relax, chill out a bit, and do something I've wanted to for a while. So I present to you, the Acronym FAQ, now divided into sections by alphabetical order! (URL) LMKWYT. Do (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Can one sort NG search results by date?
|
|
(...) Yes, but it's not too easy (yet)... (URL) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) FYI, you can throw requests like that at me now. I'm at home on LUGNET almost all day. Todd's at his "day job." That doesn't guarentee I'll be quicker though ;-) -Suz (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: FAQ Needed?
|
|
I'll do you one better. Tim, If you (or any robotics expert) will locate posts in lugnet.robotics that contain the most frequent questions and answers (can be the same or different posts) then I'll edit the posts into the FAQ Todd referred to. Or, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: FAQ Needed?
|
|
(...) Or of course, Tim, if you've got enough time on you hands, you could create a robotics FAQ with questions you feel are appropriate, and then ask Cary to link to it. :-) Making an FAQ is easier than one might think... Once I decided to try for (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: FAQ Needed?
|
|
(...) Cary Clark has assembled a multi-disciplinary LEGO FAQ here: (URL) on items posted to lugnet.faq over the past couple of years. The robotics section is currently small, but contributions are always welcome (feel free to crosspost questions and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) No sweat, Todd... you're busy. I understand. That's just the way it goes. ;-) And thanks for doing it now! -Shiri (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) Sorry, Shiri -- didn't mean to blow you off. It was trivial to fix. --Todd (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) he'll listen to you, though. ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
Nice work, Shiri! Todd, can you change the link here: (URL) Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7w1A5.6Gz@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) Hmmm, true, I guess it's a service for "oldies" and newbies alike! Glad I could help. (...) Alrighty, but that means I have to add Florida too. ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
(...) Nice work Shiri! Thanks! My memory doesn't always work. Now all I need to do is remember where to look instead of remembering all the individual acronyms. One request, please add FL = Fabuland :-) sheree (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Acronym FAQ Update - links to sets, "play themes" and "lego lines"
|
|
Hi everyone, I just updated the LEGO Acronym FAQ: (URL) free to visit, bookmark it if you'd like, and of course comment if there's anything to comment about. I added links directly to all sets and themes mentioned. -Shiri P.S. I'm not quite so sure (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.announce) !!
|
