Subject:
|
Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 23:11:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3424 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Cary Clark writes:
> Hi Shiri:
>
> I'd strongly recommend leaving in the 'All entries on one page' option. It's
> fast enough to bring the whole thing in (at least with a broadband
> connection) and I'd find it disappointing to click on each letter just to
> find out that there are no acronyms that start with E, G, J, and so on.
Right. I like it better, too. Which is why I'm wondering if the alphabetical
division is helpful at all. Do you (or anyone, for that matter) think it is?
> I recommend having the ": <a A> <b B> ..." portion of each FAQ entry and the
> body of the FAQ entry each put into separate FAQ pages. Then the individual
> letters could include both, while the 'all' page could include only the
> 'meat', plus possibly the letter directory at the top and bottom of the
> page.
Hmmm, good idea! And I can use a single page for all the links. Great!
Thanks, Cary!
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Acronym FAQ Update - Alphabetical list
|
| Hi Shiri: I'd strongly recommend leaving in the 'All entries on one page' option. It's fast enough to bring the whole thing in (at least with a broadband connection) and I'd find it disappointing to click on each letter just to find out that there (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
