|
|
 | | Re: Suggestions for Lego: My two cents
|
| Yadda, yadda, yadda. Brevity is the soul of wit: Just bring back Pirates! :-) Bruce (...) expand (...) this (...) from (...) what (...) post (...) a (...) track (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Suggestions for Lego: My two cents
|
| It's taken me a couple days to go through all of the posts following Mr Justus' bomb-shell. It's nice to see lego moving in a more customer-friendly direction. I'd like to add my suggestions/wants/needs :) to the mix, so here goes: I'd like to echo (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| Dogs shouldn't let friends who are annoyed post annoyed, no? <g> ---...--- (...) "Sturm und drang," I think. Don't have a German distionary, so i can't be sure right now. Rob (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| Mike Stanley wrote: <snip> (...) Yeah, I think we got y'all's point. But I think the real point is: legalities aside, TLC didn't want that material distributed around. Just because one is *able* to get something on this side of a firewall doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) A clearer distinction can be drawn by saying "you are acting like a such and such" as opposed to saying "you *are* a such and such." Similar to the difference between "you are lying" and "you are a liar." By criticizing someone's action or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) See, this is where you lose me. Completely. The prove it Prove It, PROVE IT! post struck me as amazingly rude. And NOT rude to TLC. To *Todd.* That's who is was being addressed to, no? Todd had taken a stance which he felt (excuse me for (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) Just stepping in to point out that the scans are invaluable to me and I would be impacted by not having them around. At least, I *would* be if I got off my duff and started turning the 200+ pounds of used, unsorted LEGO back into sets again. I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) No skin off my nose - I know my IQ, and it's well over to the higher end of the scale (and I mean WELL over) ;-) (IQ != common sense, however) I stand by my "PROVE IT" comments. I wanted proof from TLC, and I got it, end of story - until we (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) You matter, but I wasn't talking about you. :) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: What I'd like to see...please
|
| I don't want to sound the opposite of constructive in this post, but I am not too excited by your request. At the moment, I have scans of all the instructions I can handle! I have them pretty well divided by theme/age. I have a spare hard drive for (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
