 | | Re: Technic, what happened to the good old days?
|
|
(...) I really like all these ideas i think there are plenty of ideas hear and in this and other similar threds to keep the technic line fresh for years. (...) You have raised a very good point. Technic is trying to compete with other market areas (...) (18 years ago, 11-Feb-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: New Electrical Connectors ( LEGO --> Please, please read )
|
|
One more thing to add to this list, an Electro-magnetic Coil would be really cool part. Perhaps you could release a larger Crawler Crane using the new track links of course with an Electromagnetic Coil instead of a hook. Something like this: (URL) (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: New Electrical Connectors ( LEGO --> Please, please read )
|
|
(...) ... (...) I second the idea of conversion connectors... Alex Farlie (18 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | New Electrical Connectors ( LEGO --> Please, please read )
|
|
Dear LEGO, Like many others I am very happy to see you create this new electrical system, specifically the IR Receivers which allow for remote control of up to eight different motors. And speaking of motors, it is great to see that you are (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic, what happened to the good old days?
|
|
(...) the barcode truck - the models after it did not give me the urge to race down toys r us with money ;). Technic needs new pieces, perhaps more realistic gearbox parts so a more gearbox like action can be attained, anti roll bar pieces, real (...) (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
|
(...) Didier is right, TLC can't do it, probably it was their legal office to deny it, but it's obvious that it hurts. In someway it's going on the same thing happened whith the Little Armory vs. the new SW guns. I would very happy if TLC would use (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
|
(...) Well after talking with a lawyer today it seems as if I have no recourse, as it's been more than a year since I first announced the double crossover. Quite honestly I think it sucks but, since I cannot go after TLC, TLC should at least be kind (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Hi Ondrew, I understand your feeling, Maybe aknowledgement is something they would like to give you but they CAN'T simply for legal reasons : they would recognize explicitely that the concept is from you and then they would have to (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
|
(...) We could debate whether it was god who created me all day, but I do know I was the first to create the double crossover. As seen in this (URL) post> dated Tue, 22 Nov 2005 (URL) I find it odd that the only 3 differences that can seen between (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OMG, articulated skeleton arms?!!
|
|
(...) Since when does most of what LEGO does make any sense?? I gave up trying to make sense out of what they do many years ago. [1] (...) I consider the new skelton to be an IMPROVEMENT. The old floppy, fall-off skelton arms were not very good. (...) (18 years ago, 29-Dec-06, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
