 | | Re: All your typo are belong to us?
|
|
(...) I have noticed this more and more in every branch of media: catalogues, magazines, novels, etc. I think it's due to the reliance on computer spell-checking instead of honest-to-goodness proof-reading. The biggest errors I've seen involve using (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: All your typo are belong to us?
|
|
(...) LOL! Ha ha! (...) Or maybe they're using a bad-quality laptop like me - It's fairly hard to type on this hunk of I-can't-download-3-M...s-anymore! (That's pretty sad considering I have only a couple things installed: StarCraft, (a computer (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | All your typo are belong to us?
|
|
While visiting lego.com, I sometimes see incorrect words mixed in, here and there. I think it's kinda cute. But yesterday, I noticed -three- typos in one product's description alone. Now I'm beginning to wonder how this happens. Is TLC using OCR to (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
"Nathanael Kuipers" <kuipers_n@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HEBoHG.Ezu@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) I'll do. (...) I like the idea of instructions on CD :-) One idea did cross my mind for the 8466 and I think you'd be the guy to do it. (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego shop
|
|
Dug, just to support you, you're not the only one who wants this. Bert PS I would also love to work for them in such a shop, so I'm queueing the line, who follows? "Duq" <lugnetpost@skipthis...tmfweb.nl> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
|
"Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:HEGtG4.11G9@lugnet.com... (...) :) (...) of (...) in a (...) I do admit I felt slightly ripped off for paying £15 (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
|
(...) Thats because they we're pants! (that's underwear to any non-brits :-) Steve (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
|
(...) 6335, (...) Lego sets have an average life of 2 years, then they make way for new sets/new lines. If the line does well, more sets follow. The sheer amount of UFO and Insectoids sets I saw getting reduced down to virtually nothing in a vain (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | WHY?!?!?!
|
|
Dear Lego, Why did you ever discontue some really great loved-by-children (like me :) pieces and sets? Like the 1994-1996 Town > Race/Rescue sets like 6337, 6335, 6598, 6625, etc. And the 1997-1998 Space > UFO/Insectoids? And the pieces, (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Lego shop
|
|
Dear Lego, having seen the Lego Shop in Köln (Cologne) I just have to ask you: PLEASE open a similar shop in Holland! Amsterdam, Den Haag, Utrecht, just give us a shop like that! Or even better, make it a cross between the Lego shop in Köln (in (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) Hi Adrian, Thanx!!:-) At the moment I'm working on the instructions of my Sportscar out of the 8458 Silver champion (also on brickshelf). If there are enough interested people I could probably make instructions of the GTcar too. (I want to (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
"Nathanael Kuipers" <kuipers_n@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HE9zB3.CoK@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) I have to say "Now THAT is something I most definitely like to see from LEGO!" (I hope some head honcho at the co. is reading this) You have (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Breakfast Cereal
|
|
(...) Oops, I meant for this to be out of .galidor and into .dear-lego right away-- sorry bout that. (21 years ago, 3-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
The color sucks and yes, going to BrickLink to get those (...) HI, I do agree. I have to admit that I don't like the green panels either so that's the reason why I didn't use them in my MOC out of the 8458 and 8466. For me the most important parts (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, I really liked what you did with those big cars. RC is the only thing I missed in these cars and to be honest in my own big Lego model cars too. I would love to have my GTcar ((URL) motorised and RC controlled, but I don't know if it (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3EAFFAAC.C448F1...faq.com... (...) There's a (...) hideous. It (...) still (...) shade). (...) puke (...) panels (...) to come (...) I'm with you there! The color sucks and yes, going (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please do whatever business thingo you did that lead tothe 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) Okay, he's the first to PUBICLY say he likes the color. I'll be the second. Any new colors that aren't derivitives of Tan are welcomed be myself and many others. Bring on more metallic colors-we'll keep using them. They key to using these (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) I don't want a car, I never said I did, I only buy sets for the great parts and then build my own thing. I just want to build cool vehicles with driven steer axles. I also have no experience of the 8448, although I know I hate the wheel trims. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I'd rather have the 8466 over the 8880, even with the green panels--the 8880 is pretty neat, but overly complicated and doesn't have near the suspension 'out of the box' that the 8466 does. I find that if you want a car, the 8448 (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
|
I've just had another idea (...) The next time their is a poll to choose which set should be re-released why not have an advocate for each potential set. Each advocate could be drawn from the Afol community and state their case for why their chosen (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
