| |
Dear Lego,
Why did you ever discontue some really great loved-by-children (like me :)
pieces and sets? Like the 1994-1996 Town > Race/Rescue sets like 6337, 6335,
6598, 6625, etc. And the 1997-1998 Space > UFO/Insectoids? And the pieces,
x81(motorcycle TWO WHEELED sometimes with windshield) and 4216, 4217, 4218,
and 4219, garage pieces???
Also, why did you ever start juinorization? Think about this: 6636 has 271
pcs. 6598 has 540. 6636 looks a little bigger, (but smart peoples know its
not :) but if you take away one measly piece, 6598 has double the amount of
6636's parts (plus 6598's are more useful and cooler! :)
Last question: When you guys created the Legends, why didn't you use the
original numbers of pieces on all the sets? TIP: Original is better, you
should rerelease sets with the same amount of pieces as you originally
released them with, otherwise everyone will go to Bricklink for copies of
the original.
Any answers are appreciated.
Matt C.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
| (...) 6335, (...) Lego sets have an average life of 2 years, then they make way for new sets/new lines. If the line does well, more sets follow. The sheer amount of UFO and Insectoids sets I saw getting reduced down to virtually nothing in a vain (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
| (...) I seem to recall raising this point about a year ago, but with worse results then you'll ever get. (note, there was a lot of vitriol into my message, so no surprise.) Here's the logic behind your question. In order to raise a profit, like any (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
