Subject:
|
Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 May 2003 12:31:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2250 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, James Stacey writes:
> > Why did you ever discontue some really great loved-by-children (like me :)
> > pieces and sets? Like the 1994-1996 Town > Race/Rescue sets like 6337, • 6335,
> > 6598, 6625, etc. And the 1997-1998 Space > UFO/Insectoids?
>
> Lego sets have an average life of 2 years, then they make way for new
> sets/new lines. If the line does well, more sets follow. The sheer amount of
> UFO and Insectoids sets I saw getting reduced down to virtually nothing in a
> vain attempt to shift them (I got one of the £70 sets for £15) says to me
> that maybe not everyone liked them ;)
Thats because they we're pants! (that's underwear to any non-brits :-)
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
| "Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:HEGtG4.11G9@lugnet.com... (...) :) (...) of (...) in a (...) I do admit I felt slightly ripped off for paying £15 (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: WHY?!?!?!
|
| (...) 6335, (...) Lego sets have an average life of 2 years, then they make way for new sets/new lines. If the line does well, more sets follow. The sheer amount of UFO and Insectoids sets I saw getting reduced down to virtually nothing in a vain (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
