 | | Re: foo!
|
|
Hi Richard - "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMJ85G.9KB@lugnet.com... (...) My thoughts are - just keep persistent at the constructive criticism. Allan mentioned that he was committed to whining and complaining until (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
(...) And you think there are ways to get through to them that work? Do tell... (...) Yes, and I have given such thanks over the Guarded Inn, for example. Of course the devil is in the details -- I wasn't quite as pleased to actually receive the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMIFnJ.37@lugnet.com... (...) Fine, disturb may have been the wrong word to use. But, it still upsets me in the sense that I believe its futile and not the kind of message that will get (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | foo!
|
|
(...) Which disturbed you then and disturbs you now? C'mon? Reread it, it's not that harsh -- except for maybe the subject line. Disturbs? I think you aren't actually losing any sleep over it, Tim. ;o) Anyway, you know what I owe TLC? Nothing. For (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I completely agree with you. That was why I prefaced my comments with this statement: +++...+++ (...) +++...+++ (...) Well... I have mixed feelings about this stance. Normally I'm considered a very reasonable person. More than once co-workers (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GMI9n7.8q1@lugnet.com... (...) I recall a discussion I had with a couple of them towards the beginning of the year when Richard was commenting quite harshly then too. When I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC declares Bankruptcy!
|
|
(...) I don't like to speak for anyone else, so let me answer your question from my own perspective. Many of my recent posts have been similar in their critical nature, though more subdued in their tone. And the reason is simple. I am sick and tired (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I agree, his tone might have been a bit harsh... there are probably ways to express these feelings and maintain a little more integrity. (...) Well... good. I hope you're right. Maybe some of this dissatisfaction might eventually trickle up (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC declares Bankruptcy! (Kristiansen's unfurl golden parachute...)
|
|
If you're that disappointed with TLC then why not sell your stuff and find a new hobby? (...) But they do still release bricks, and they've realised their error of judgement with Znap. (...) course): That's right. They're more durable now, and in (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Didn't you know? Hop-Frog specializes in Vehemence. No halfway measures for him, no sir! If he decides to feel something, he feels it beyond all reasonable limits, and darned if he isn't going to make sure we all Know His Ire. Chill, dude. :) (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
