 | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | Yeah LEGO, those juniorized palm trees are disgusting. My 4- and 6 year old children don't like them either. Think of it. I don't EVER will buy another set that includes those trees. NEVER. Arnold (...) building (...) bringing (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Good plan. We bought one set bearing a mono-palm, <set:5976>, but we never will again! EVER. Steve (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Yep, me either. For a while I was planning on buying the big one <set:5986> but after getting the 5976 I decided against it. The palm tree was a major reason why. -Shiri (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) I bought a second 5976, on clearance, and *threw out* 2 of 3 pieces of the new palm tree. (I kept the 2x2 round plate.) This is the only Lego element I've ever discarded so. I even keep broken pieces around. James (URL) getting paid for this (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —John Gerlach
|
| | | | | | | (...) The only good thing about that tree is that minifigure hands can hold onto the trunk. You can have monkeys climbing the palm trees! Does that make it worth keeping? I guess that's up to you... ;-) JohnG, GMLTC (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | | | (...) new (...) Hey, I had monkeys climin' the old trees as well! -Shiri (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —David Kadansky
|
| | | | | | | So far, the only Lego "element" I've been able to bring myself to throw out has been Throwbot cases. James Brown wrote: <SNIP SNIP> (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | (...) I remember playing with my first tree and thinking how fabulous it was, that wasn't LEGO a great toy because it was inventive and managed to create a tree from the most unlikely looking bits. Then I had fun bending them and shaping them to my (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —David Till
|
| | | | | | | Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) that (...) tree (...) shaping (...) new (...) HORRIBLE (...) If you want people to buy LEGO kits as opposed to your competitors toys, then you need to add value - the values of LEGO are summed up in the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Strictly speaking, the 1x2 brick with side clip isn't a POOP--you can't build it out of other pieces. But it is a juniorized, un-lego-ish nightmare. Should have been a 1x2 plate with a side clip. Steve (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) How about two 1x2 plates sandwiching a 1x2 plate with a side clip? Seems poopy to me... -John (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | Uh, WHAT 1x2 plate with side clip? I've only ever seen 1x1, and you can't make the 1x2 brick with side clip with a 1x1 plate with side clip. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) (URL) Sorry, I was thinking about this guy as opposed to his new juniorized counterpart, the 1x2 brick. -John (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | That's a 1x2 plate with HANDLE, not side-clip ;-) Everyone else was talking about the new 1x2 brick with side clip (horizontal clip, holds things vertically). (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | (...) Agreed - a 1x2 plate with side clip would have been an interesting new piece, perhaps not that useful.. but the extra two 1x2 plates would have been nice! It is poopy in principle (in my mind anyway), as I haven't seen a use for it that (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) I find this piece good, actually. It allows me to center things in walls that are even in length (2 studs, 4 studs, etc), which can't be done with a 1x1 plate w/clip. Having the various clips on bricks also means that the back side of the wall (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Palm Tree Junior —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) It's kind of sad, actually... Having palm trees actually used to be a reason TO buy the sets... now it's a reason AGAINST buying them. I used to justify my set buying with the fact that sets had a palm tree in them. That's one reason I've (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
