 | | Re: More inventories on peeron.com! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Sorry to go off-topic here, but do you think partsref is too fragmented? I realize I'm reading extra meaning into what you wrote, but this is an impression one could get from it... So I'm asking straight out. Steve Christopher! have you backed (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More inventories on peeron.com! —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | (...) NO. Not at all. I think that Partref is organized very intuitively. And with all of the keyword searches available, the only reason for not finding a part on partref is because the part does not yet have a listing there. I have been using (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More inventories on peeron.com! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) OK, good. That was my main concern. (...) OK, good. I agree with most of these, at least sort of. :) (...) I wouldn't change something because just one person says so. Even (especially) if that one person is me. There are a few people who I (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | (...) And I must mention that, although it is in some ways convenient to be able to find pieces by theme, things get messy when themes are used in the hierarchy. For example, consider the Castle section of Partsref, and these "Castle *" parts. There (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | | | (...) I'll let Steve fight his own battle - but I will point out that partref uses %100 ldraw names... :) (...) Tell me about it. Our current stance on peeron is that we won't create new names for pieces that already have names via ldraw/partsref... (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | (...) Are you letting me fight my own battles, or throwing me to the wolves? ;) Partsref using LDraw names is no defense for me... (...) And my stance is that partsref uses the data from ldraw. My advantage is that when LDraw changes, it's very easy (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Kevin Dixon
|
| | | | | | Hi, (...) What is the procedure for someone else to add photos and new parts to your db inventory on peeron? I just got a digital camera, and would be willing to photo new parts in MISB sets I inventory. Would I just send you the photo and find the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) well, if the part has a partsref number, then it doesn't need a picture, since all parts in partsref have dats. So we only need pictures of parts that are not in partsref. Now, if the part has a number on it, use that, if not, give it an (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) heh, I agree - except that I can't think of a way to group headgear together... not without using keywords or something... (which is planned, I'll admit). (...) heh, no, not really - just we got tired of the huge pile of sets waiting to be (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | |
