 | | Re: Part numbers / descriptions for Space Port and Amazonas
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot, I couldn't find the number inside (maybe I should fix my hobby room lighting ;-) ). Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | looking for some set inventories...
|
|
I am looking for inventories of the folowing sets, can anyone help? 7101 lightsaber duel 7127 imperial atst 7131 anakins podracer 7144 slave 1 7155 trade federation aat 7159 pod bucket 7180 b-wing 7186 wattos junkyard 8008 stormtrooper Thanks In (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Set inventory for 7110
|
|
This inventory may be freely used, distributed, adapted, corrected, used in databases, fed to dogs, given cement slippers, etc. by anybody who so wishes. Note: part numbers are mostly Peeron, but the inventory is not Peeron-style. Set inventory for (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Set inventory for 6096
|
|
This inventory may be freely used, distributed, adapted, corrected, used in databases, fed to dogs, sent to Ghana, etc. by anybody who so wishes. Note: part numbers are mostly Peeron, but the inventory is not Peeron-style. Set Inventory for (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Set inventory for 6094
|
|
This inventory may be freely used, distributed, adapted, corrected, used in databases, fed to dogs, turned into a Broadway musical, etc. by anybody who so wishes. Note: part numbers are mostly Peeron, but the inventory is not Peeron-style. Set (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Set Inventory for 4811
|
|
This inventory may be freely used, distributed, adapted, corrected, used in databases, fed to dogs, mailed to the White House, etc. by anybody who so wishes. Note: part numbers are mostly Peeron, but the inventory is not Peeron-style. Set Inventory (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: 1815 Paradisa Lifeguard inventory
|
|
(...) Arrrggghh!! ok it looked fine when I posted it and in the web view but just sitting in my newsreader or the raw view the columns are a bit messed up. Oh well the tabs should still be in there so it should work for importing and people going to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | 1815 Paradisa Lifeguard inventory
|
|
1815 Paradisa Lifeguard Qty Color Part# Description Notes 1 yellow 3033 Plate 6 x 10 5 gray 4073 Plate 1 x 1 round one of five is extra 1 white 3795 Plate 2 x 6 1 white 4476 Support 2 x 4 x 5 Stanchion Inclined 2 white 4589 Cone 1 x 1 1 white 3062b (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) Nice. (...) Well like I mentioned, the part sellers might view their inventory as a 'trade secret', not wanting to give anything to their competition. But that's not MY situation, so I'll post it eventually. (...) It's good. (...) Mike (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) Some parts have two (or more) different numbers, for various reasons. One common reason is LEGO will sometimes have two different molds for the same part. One mold for molding opaque parts and another for transparent molding. Apparently, (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) yah, right now it just searches the description of the pieces, and the set names (that's actually a new feature - try searching for "metroliner" :) (...) nodnod - inventorying and then keeping it private is kinda pointless, imo :) (...) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) I kind of thought that they codes for which mold section they came from and or color? I did know that they were not the part #'s. I was/am trying to cast the widest net for responses :^) Mike (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:38:00 GMT, Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote: You are one of the people I was hoping for an answer from actually. (...) I thought there WAS a keyword search? Or is it just that the keywords are merely exactly what the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) This other numbers are batch/date numbers, not piece codes. Paulo (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
|
(...) well, we use the peeron list, but that's kinda obvious :) (...) yup, ldraw names are kinda funkey that way, but they're the most common standard we could find... I should think of a way to implement they keywords search... (...) if there's an (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | A question about doing inventories
|
|
I decided to do a inventory of 1815 Paradisa Lifeguard and have a question or three :^) What is the best naming convention? Auczilla? partsref? Peeron? just use whatever I come up with? I have found LDraw part #'s for most of it so far, some of the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: What's this brick called?
|
|
Yeah, that's it! Thank you very much. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer L. Boger <jenn@peeron.com> To: Mychal Zimny <locutus@clear.lakes.com> Cc: lugnet.general@lugnet.com <lugnet.general@lugnet.com>; lugnet.db.brictionar...lugnet.com (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: What's this brick called?
|
|
Do you mean this one? (...) FUT: lugnet.db.brictionary (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Another (semi-) standard field for inventories
|
|
(...) Old post but hey why not :^) I recently bought a 4806 Axe Cart which is a small boxed castle set. It normally comes glued on all sides and flaps, this had been opened then resealed with a LEGO seal like they use on the larger boxes that have (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 6072
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'd rather do .6 or .7 or .67 or even b2p than & 2/3, but that's the existing standard, and I'm not prepared to tackle a re-do. Steve (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
