Subject:
|
Re: A question about doing inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:14:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MTIMM@USINTERNETspamless.COM
|
Viewed:
|
640 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:38:00 GMT, Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote:
You are one of the people I was hoping for an answer from actually.
> Mike Timm wrote:
>
> > What is the best naming convention? Auczilla? partsref? Peeron? just
> > use whatever I come up with?
>
> well, we use the peeron list, but that's kinda obvious :)
>
> > I have found LDraw part #'s for most of it so far, some of the parts
> > didn't come up very easily on either partsref or peeron (try chair on
> > peeron, you don't get the 2 x 2 minifig chair, you need to use Town
> > seat to have it pop up, and on parts ref you get no matches for chair
> > at all... I found it by category browsing for something else)
>
> yup, ldraw names are kinda funkey that way, but they're the most common
> standard we could find... I should think of a way to implement they
> keywords search...
I thought there WAS a keyword search? Or is it just that the keywords
are merely exactly what the description is rather than including
alternate keywords?
>
> > Also how does a person handle printed minifig torsos?
>
> if there's an ldraw part for that printing, we use whatever ldraw number
> there is (973pNN). when ldraw doesn't have the pattern, we try to take
> a picutre, and give it one of our numbers - 973pxNN...
>
>
> > Also I won't be doing a count on this set as it was opened and built
> > for a while before I decided to inventory it. (kept separate from
> > other LEGO though
>
> >
> > Should I include both the LEGO part number and the LDraw part numbers
>
> > what about the 'secondary' numbers on a brick? like 7-06 or 11 04?
>
> what lego number? we always try to go by what's on the brick... only
> the parts number, not the other number there, like the 7-06 or 11 04...
> Can you give an example where the lego number isn't the same as the
> ldraw one?
Don't actually have an example at the moment but actually haven't
cross checked back between the 2 columns of text yet, like I said I am
still working on it. I figured I'd throw that question out to the
masses since I was asking anyways :^)
>
> > I've basically got the inventory done, it just that the notes are
> > really umm, confusing and lack a coherent format and before I format
> > it I want to know what is the best way to do so. I don't want to
> > format it twice.....
>
> nodnod, doing it good the first time means you don't have to do it again
> :) if you do choose to index it by the ldraw part numbers, I'd like to
> include your inventory in peeron, with your permission of course...
>
> :)
I was kinda aiming for posting it here and for inclusion in peeron and
where ever else anyone wants to use it. Or in other words I wasn't
going for just submitting to peeron alone but certainly have no
objection to your use of it once I get it done. Seems kinda pointless
for me to make up the inventory then not make it available (on a new
set that is still common I can see the part sellers keeping the
inventory private, but not on a 1996 set....)
Oh by the way, the inventory for 7124 Flash speeder has the Town Seat
(4079) listed just as 'chair' , and I believe the red/black base/mini
antenna is the lever (298) and lever base (4593) combo. I don't have
my copy handy (i.e. lost in the collective) to double check with
though. You can see the town seats in the Lugnet Guide picture.
Mike
--
All other themes are just spare parts for Castle! :^)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
| (...) yah, right now it just searches the description of the pieces, and the set names (that's actually a new feature - try searching for "metroliner" :) (...) nodnod - inventorying and then keeping it private is kinda pointless, imo :) (...) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question about doing inventories
|
| (...) well, we use the peeron list, but that's kinda obvious :) (...) yup, ldraw names are kinda funkey that way, but they're the most common standard we could find... I should think of a way to implement they keywords search... (...) if there's an (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
