Subject:
|
Re: Color Change background
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:22:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1028 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Christian Treczoks wrote:
> Jake McKee wrote:
>
> > * Admitting that we made a mistake in our implementation
> "Sorry, I dropped your baby".
Geez. That's a bit thick in my personal view.
(snipped a lot of stuff in the same vein)
>
> Sorry, Jake, but it was really nothing really new in this post.
>
> I failed to notice the promised "Good Thinking" - my error?
Yes, I think it *is* your error. You did "fail to notice"...
Jake *explained* why the Design Lab felt there was a strong need to change
things. You may not agree that it was a legitimate need to rationalise the
palette. That's fine. You might be right.
But to just *deny* that it was good thinking, and demand that people be fired...
That just doesn't strike me as useful. Spiteful maybe, but not useful.
I suspect that Jake spent some considerable internal political capital on our
behalf to get this level of detail and get it approved to be shared. These sorts
of vitriolic posts don't help him make the case upwards that it's WORTH sharing.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) Agreed. I've been staying awfully quiet of late, in part because I've already made my opinion clear, done my public seething, and have now gone about adapting myself to what is coming down the pike. Sure, it's lousy that this has happened to (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
| | | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) I concur wholeheartedly. I'm hardly a pro-corporate apologist, so, speaking as a hostile witness, I'd have to assert that this is a truly rare example of a company making its goals and thought processes known to its customers. Thanks to Jake (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
| | | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) Yes, but he left anything out that I'd count as good thinking. He promised to explain complicated things, so complicated that he was not sure wether it would work out in text. But all he brought up was "They thought hard, and hard, and hard!" (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
| | | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) Well even if there *was* a legitimate need, it still doesn't explain how they (the Design Lab) thought replacing grey with bley would help that need. I would be very interested in hearing the logic behind that. I would also be interested in (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) "Sorry, I dropped your baby". It is *not* only the implementation. The whole idea was a stupid idea from the very beginning, and none of those in charge thought about the consequences of this first-grade mistake. The total failure of (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
