Subject:
|
Re: which is better 6066 or 6077
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:22:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
473 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Joel Jacobsen writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Bill Farkas writes:
> > > I have 6077, but not 6066 - waitin' for a good deal on e-bay. 6077 is bigger
> > > definitely bigger than 6066 - but 6066 does look cool for playability. '77
> > > is also GREAT for parts and figs, and it's hinged to open up, which is cool.
>
> I agree, I like 6077 better, it has more parts, an ocean baseplate, and the
> black forestmen (I *love* that torso - I use it for Doyle).
6066 comes with a Black Forester's torso, actually. It's where I got mine.
It had Black, Red and Blue as I recall.
>
> > 6071 IS nice - the forest wench torso was a really cool inclusion.
>
> *Definitely* (my own favorite character, Daphne, is made with the "forest
> babe" torso).
I wish I had more of 'em. :)
> > However,
> > mine came with the annoying white paint on the plate to deliniate where one
> > should begin building.
>
> I think all the 6071 sets came with this... I have two copies of that
> baseplate, and both have it. Does anyone have the 6071 BP *without* the
> white studs? That's interesting. I didn't think they existed.
I don't know if they did or not, really. I just think it's silly.
> > To me this takes a great deal away from the set,
> > because I have to think about covering up the white dots if I wish to use
> > this plate for a MOC.
>
> <nod> True. But to me, the biggest minus of the BP is the fact that *it
> doesn't line up with itself*, i.e. two copies of it, put end to end, are off
> by - get this - *one* stud. Ugh! I find that really frustrating; it's so
> hard to make a good-looking river with just one BP.
Ick... that would suck. For a river, I use the Indian village sets from Wild
West, as well as the river bp's from the Islander's theme of Pirates. I have
a curvey (Or is that meandering??) stream since I have about 5 curved BP's
with water on them... :)
> > I don't own a 6077, but I do own a 6066 and I love it. It is definately my
> > favorite of the Forester's/Dark Forester's sets that I own. Probably because
> > I had to save up to get it as a kid. :)
>
> I have all three of those (6077, 6066, 6071) that I was lucky enough to get
> from a fellow AFOL (Andreas Stabno). Pricey, but (IMHO) worth it - and
> they're all really sweet.
> A downside though is, they have no interior. I was considering adding one,
> but then I needed the grey pieces, so I took them all apart... oh well.
> Someday, right? ;-)
>
> -Shiri
I'd always looked at 6077 but I never got it. Of the Forester's sets I have
6054, 6066 and 6071. While 6066 is my absolute favorite of these three, I
really like 6054 - it was the first set (that I know of) to have the
Forester's shields and it was the "treehouse" I never really had as a kid. :)
I've added an interior to 6054 and 6066 before and placed them on the
cobblestone baseplate from 6374 (They fit perfectly). Generally I preferred
to keep these two sets built and joined up in this fashion rather than
building seperate creations from them. :)
Joel J
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: which is better 6066 or 6077
|
| (...) I agree, I like 6077 better, it has more parts, an ocean baseplate, and the black forestmen (I *love* that torso - I use it for Doyle). (...) *Definitely* (my own favorite character, Daphne, is made with the "forest babe" torso). (...) I think (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
