Subject:
|
Re: which is better 6066 or 6077
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:50:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
534 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Nathan Todd writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering which is considered the better forestmen set 6066
> (camoflauged outpost) or 6077 (woodsmen water fortress)? I know 6077 sells
> for more, but is it really better? Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks and God Bless,
>
> Nan
Hello Nathan,
I have 6077, but not 6066 - waitin' for a good deal on e-bay. 6077 is bigger
definitely bigger than 6066 - but 6066 does look cool for playability. '77
is also GREAT for parts and figs, and it's hinged to open up, which is cool.
I like the 6077 a lot, but my favorite Forestmen set is 6071 - awesome base
plate, even better playability, and better figs, by far! But, as I said, I
don't have a 6066 - YET - so I can't give an opinion about it, other than it
looks VERY cool from the pictures.
Oh, and did I mention that I just got a 6086 off e-bay at below retail! sorry.
Bill (still exited about acquiring a 6086......at below retail!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: which is better 6066 or 6077
|
| (...) 6071 IS nice - the forest wench torso was a really cool inclusion. However, mine came with the annoying white paint on the plate to deliniate where one should begin building. To me this takes a great deal away from the set, because I have to (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | which is better 6066 or 6077
|
| Hi, I'm just wondering which is considered the better forestmen set 6066 (camoflauged outpost) or 6077 (woodsmen water fortress)? I know 6077 sells for more, but is it really better? Any thoughts? Thanks and God Bless, Nan (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
