 | | An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Andrew Krug
|
| | | I apologize that my CW question began to spin off into a comic book discussion. You know how things go. That has been moved to the off topic debate area however and now I would like to restate my theory on CW and once again ask for feedback: Hello (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) This post really should be in the Castle World newsgroup(1), and I have posted follow-ups there. Administration and ideas relating to the running of Castle World really should not be posted here in the Castle group. Jeff (Removes the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Andrew Krug
|
| | | | | | (...) Jeff Thanks for the advice. I'm kinda new to all this so I'm not sure how many different areas there are and what goes where. What types of things go here? General Castle stuff?? Thanks Andy (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) ROFL... am I *really* horrible with nitpicking groups and stuff? By the reaction when I'm gone... I dunno what to think anymore... (...) lugnet.castle.org.cw is for CW-related things... *especially* decision making, planning, etc. Creations (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Andrew Krug
|
| | | | | | Shiri Thanks for the feedback. With all the rooms and sub-rooms to LUGNET it's sometimes difficult for me to determine where exactly to put stuff. Sometimes when I reply to a message it gets sent automatically to several different areas and to be (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Kyle Peterson
|
| | | | | Andrew, thanks for your provacative insights as well. I do know however that people tend to be protective of their private hoards of (...) giving >any up (regardless of how good the cause may seem)in trade. (...) This is a valid comment/problem (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Andrew Krug
|
| | | | | | (...) Good points here Kyle and I'm not sure if some folks will ever wish to part with their figs CW or no CW. (although if anyone is interested in talking about possibilities let me know). (...) I too have been developing a rough sketch of a map (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Craig Hamilton
|
| | | | (...) lugnet.castle.org.cw is the first step to getting back on track! (...) "whatever works", i always say. ;-) (...) aha! the builder's quandry of trading. i know too well... as soon as you trade it, that's when you need it! for the playabiliity (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An attempt to get back on track with my CW questions. —Andrew Krug
|
| | | | Craig hey once again some great thoughts (all of which I appreciate). I am by no means critizing (spelling?) CW or its progress. I know we all have lives outside of Legos so I can appreciate the huge task it must be to get it updated much less (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
