Subject:
|
Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Nov 1999 03:30:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
868 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Mike Stanley writes:
> Bruce Schlickbernd <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:
> > > You didn't understand what I tried to say. WW is as much NOT
> > > Pirates to me as Ninja is NOT Castle.
> >
> > I do understand what you are trying to say, I just don't see your logic as
> > compelling in any way.
>
> Really? Wow.
Gosh, now I'm really impressed. Golly gee.
>
> > >
> > > It's a Castle subtheme because Lego says it is. That doesn't change
> > > the fact that it sucks and that it doesn't blow my skirt up. Not
> > > that I wear a skirt.
> >
> >
> > I've said a number of times this isn't about whether it sucks or doesn't • suck.
> > You said it isn't real Castles - that's all I'm arguing.
>
> Oh, ok. Well, like someone reminded me - you're entitled to your
> opinion. You're wrong, of course, but you're certainly entitled to
> to be wrong if you want to be. :)
And....that's it? Not willing or simply unable to defend your opinion? Just a
sneering dismissal? Perhaps you shouldn't be calling people "doofus", if
that's the best you can muster. I came here to get away from that kind of
nonsense on RTL. I thought you did too. Ah well. I think I made my point and
won't bother you further on this matter.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
| (...) Really? Wow. (...) Oh, ok. Well, like someone reminded me - you're entitled to your opinion. You're wrong, of course, but you're certainly entitled to to be wrong if you want to be. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
