Subject:
|
Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 23:06:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
572 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.castle, Mike Stanley writes:
> I'm not trying to attempt a parallel. I know WW has nothing to do
> with sailing ships or pirates.
>
> You didn't understand what I tried to say. WW is as much NOT
> Pirates to me as Ninja is NOT Castle.
I do understand what you are trying to say, I just don't see your logic as
compelling in any way.
>
> > Ninja has castles, swords, armor, cavalry, etc. Kind of seems REAL obvious to
> > me. It's just eastern as opposed to western. That you don't care for it is
> > fine. That it is not directly compatible, and that bugs a lot of people, I
> > understand. But it is Castles.
>
> It's a Castle subtheme because Lego says it is. That doesn't change
> the fact that it sucks and that it doesn't blow my skirt up. Not
> that I wear a skirt.
I've said a number of times this isn't about whether it sucks or doesn't suck.
You said it isn't real Castles - that's all I'm arguing.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
| (...) Really? Wow. (...) Oh, ok. Well, like someone reminded me - you're entitled to your opinion. You're wrong, of course, but you're certainly entitled to to be wrong if you want to be. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
| (...) I'm not trying to attempt a parallel. I know WW has nothing to do with sailing ships or pirates. You didn't understand what I tried to say. WW is as much NOT Pirates to me as Ninja is NOT Castle. (...) It's a Castle subtheme because Lego says (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Mike Stanley (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Doyle G. Nelson (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -David Eaton (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Mike Stanley (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Mike Stanley (10-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Bruce Schlickbernd (10-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -John DiRienzo (10-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More news on 2000 lineup! -Mike Stanley (10-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|