 | | The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Anthony Sava
|
| | | In lugnet.castle, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP (...) Once again Manfred, you inspire and urge me to improve myself. You helped me change my Village of Dahyart for the better, and now I hope you've helped me do the same for my Post mill. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Much snippage. (...) I think he has helped you a lot. Manfred's eye for detail and ability to generate constructive suggestions is nothing short of amazing. (and that database he pointed you at... what a labor of love! The people who did that must (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | (...) Ditto (...) Thanks much Larry :) I'm glad you think I didn't overdo it. (...) You're in luck Larry. According to what I've read, during the 17 or 1800s, a new invention appeared for Post Mills. It was a small rotor attached to the back wall of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | Still more snippage. With sone new crossposts! (...) Im not so keen on motor wires if they can be avoided. I'm thinking that if you were clever you could have as much rotation as you like, because you could house the motors in the base. Use a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | (...) Much snippage. Getting a powered axle through a turntable is a non-issue. Getting two through it is another thing, although not hard to do. I think the best implementation of such a device is in Jennifer Clark's fine JCB: (URL) under the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | | (...) gears and clutches for that. I've tried a crude version locking differential boxes together, and driving off the gears on the ends though. Okay, two ways to get a simple two-shaft concentric drive: The first is, as mentioned above, use a (...) (20 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) (URL) for the record, Larry, I'm. not sure I agree with you. If you take a close look to the picture (note the shadows) you would find that this mill has a skirt, and that this particular instance is only exeptional for the fact that the side (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'll buy that. What I did was spotted one that didn't have the front hanging down lower (after seeing a lot that did) and assumed, "no skirt". Functionally if all the sides hang down would that (aerodynamically) do exactly the same thing. Not (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) It turns out we both misunderstood Anthony here, he wasn't talking about the skirt at the front (he succesfully added a skirt to his model, see: (URL) ) I believe that with "ledge" Anthony he was refering to a kind af balcony or gangway at the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
