Subject:
|
Re: Castle FAQ bribe
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:00:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1478 times
|
| |
|
|
> Sheree Rosenkrantz wrote
> If this is sufficient then the minifig(s) go to Richard...
Thanks Sheree! :)
> > Cary Clark wrote:
> > But, I have to ask you to play fair. If I ask for message numbers from
> > Daniel, I have to ask them of you, too.
(What!?! So I'm not playin’ fair cause my FAQs were original?)
I did say “I wanted to think out-side-the-box!”
Perhaps you’d receive more responses if only you’d open up to general
replies. For we’d not be stifled but he limited scope of the questions…you
asked for the help Castle-Heads, then accept what we offer!!!
> Sheree Rosenkrantz wrote:
> ... who no doubt would have sent the post #s in , but now since i have, can spend the time he would have used doing so compiling more information for the Castle FAQ.
Indeed, If I knew he’d want me to ‘site precedent’ then I surely would ‘ave
compiled the sources from which I composed my master-list. But Sheree was
nice enough to do this for me. If only I knew that you wanted this Cary… I
would have gladly composed dozens of posts that support and verify my thesis.
And what of the other FAQ’s I provided?!?
Are they to be dismissed too!
:(
--==Richard==--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Castle FAQ bribe
|
| (...) Question posted by Jonathan Wilson Jan 2,2000 "Just out of interest, which castle accessory is the most valuable? The least valuable?" (URL) main replies (with others cascading from these) (2 URLs) list just posted by Richard Noeckel also (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
