Subject:
|
Re: L3P Warnings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jul 2010 07:58:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
33932 times
|
| |
|
|
--snip--
> I tried LGEO some times, even though it was very long ago.
> * I couldn't get it to work. (Parameters, I guess. Maybe missing include files?)
> * I think it's discontinued = no more parts updates.
> * It looks like quality overkill to me. I'm not after photorealistic images, but
> I don't want facetted surfaces of minifig faces. Photorealism takes way too much
> CPU power for my huge models.
LGEO was updated fairly recently (in the last two years anyway) so it's
definitely being updated sometimes.
The newer LDView releases also make POVray export very easy and you can add
parts you've made yourself simply by editing a file. I have a number of custom
POV parts that I include this way.
A matching file is a much more efficient way of utilising both libraries. If
someone improves a POVray object they can simply edit one line to include their
updated version rather than having to edit the original .DAT file.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L3P Warnings
|
| (...) But does such an export include the POV-enhanced parts in proper matrix alignment, or does the user have to figure out how to orient the part to match the output file? If the latter, then it's equivalent to not supporting the POV-Ray elements (...) (14 years ago, 1-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
| (...) I guess there we have the really big problem. We all have our own LDraw universes, and we all use LDraw for so very different purposes, different tools of choise, different approaches, different thinking, different ways to solve problems, (...) (14 years ago, 1-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
