Subject:
|
Re: L3P Warnings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:01:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
43163 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.ray, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
> > > At http://www.hassings.dk/l3/l3p14beta.html#version14 I find no directions on
> > > how to use less impopular keywords. Is there a more recommended syntax, or
> > > should I just ignore the warnings since the code still works just as expected?
> >
> > You should just ignore these warnings.
> > They are meant to discourage further use,
> > but they will still work.
>
> Wait a minute! I use L3P and inlined POV-Ray code almost daily--don't tell me
> that this is being phased out?
>
> Aaaaagghh!
>
>
> Dave!
Let's initiate a list of signatures at once! :)
/Tore
(Another almost daily inlined POV-code user)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L3P Warnings
|
| (...) A highly unpopular and controversial issue with LDRAW. You'd best create a working group to study the impact of creating your own sub-committee of an existing LDRAW committee for the purposes of resurrecting challenges to an asked-and-answered (...) (16 years ago, 28-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
| (...) Wait a minute! I use L3P and inlined POV-Ray code almost daily--don't tell me that this is being phased out? Aaaaagghh! Dave! (16 years ago, 28-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
