| |
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
>
> > A few days ago I described in passing my desire for thicker lines in
> > renderings, perhaps as an option.
> >
> > I'm wondering how hard of an enhancement that would be? I've spent
> > a little time with LDLite and it's difficult to get the same easy
> > renderings of an entire MPD.
>
> I've used this feature in LDLITE, and I'd say it's a great way to
> achieve an anti aliasing effect on the renderings.
Oh, I agree totally. (except do you mean anti aliasing? I'd call it "thicker
lines")
The images are very nice indeed. My issue is that I can't get a clean
rendering of every step in every submodel of an MPD without jumping through
some severe hoops (since I have 12-15 submodels and something like 150 steps
total across all of them, it matters very much to me how hard it is, I've
put something like 30 hours into making the doodlebug instructions so far...
and I'm looking at having to start over from scratch)
If LDLite understood rotation steps and handled submodels, I'd switch to it
for final renders with not a second thought.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Line Thickness
|
| (...) Well, after rendering at 300% and then scaling the images down again, I achieved an effect like that of anti aliasing. If I hadn't scaled down the image, the effect would simply be "thicker lines", as you say. It all depends on the useage of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
