MLCad : 390


CAD / MLCad / 390	389 \| 391

Subject:	Re: Texture mapping spec? (was Re: Doing Patterns and Bitmaps in MLCad)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:29:30 GMT
Viewed:	2334 times

In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Farlie A wrote: > In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Steve Bliss writes: > > Urg. Why so wordy? Just do: > > Sorry, Computing course at college showing through. (We were told try and > specify EVERYTHING. Unfotunatly there is no concrete defintion of what > EVREYTHING is.) :) I know what you mean. > I am inclinded to agree with your suggestion above, but are they able to cope > with 'nested' textures such as those included by line type 1? Hmm. There shouldn't be any need for 'nested' textures. Or is 'nested texturing' an area of texture-mapping that I don't know about? Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Texture mapping spec? (was Re: Doing Patterns and Bitmaps in MLCad)
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:4gvcrs8kb1v5s0n...4ax.com... (...) cope (...) I can't think of any reason to "nest" textures. The only reasons I know of to draw multiple textures over one another are to produce different (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Texture mapping spec? (was Re: Doing Patterns and Bitmaps in MLCad)
(...) Sorry, Computing course at college showing through. (We were told try and specify EVERYTHING. Unfotunatly there is no concrete defintion of what EVREYTHING is.) (...) Agreed, but with the following questions? (Assuming simple rectangular (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)

24 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search