Subject:
|
Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 03:36:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1019 times
|
| |
|
|
At 09:45 PM 7/14/99 , Todd Lehman wrote:
[...] Mega Snippage...
> .cad.dat.omr.system
> .cad.dat.omr.technic
>
> But now what does having two groups instead of one really buy? 90% of the
> models submitted will be LEGO SYSTEM models, with other 10% or so being
> LEGO TECHNIC. Each one will still have to be downloaded, viewed, and
> approved individually by someone anyway before it can be part of any
> official archive of sets.
I guess it does make sense to just have one. And it should allow
discussion on the models submitted.
> Remind me again what "the group thing" is?
Just having a newsgroup for the OMR submission...
Could you set up .cad.dat.omr?
And we do need to discuss issues like what happens when someone comes out
with a revision to a set - who gets the author tag, is it replaced on the
OMR? Standards of completeness - 80% seems adequate given parts (esp
decorated elements) limitations we have out there.
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
Get paid to surf the web! Visit:
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
| (...) Groups can be set so that they won't accept posts that don't contain DAT content, and with default followups set elsewhere for discussions. But what's the worry about keeping the discussions (of the models just posted) in the same group when (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
| (...) Good point. (...) Sounds good. So where would this list be stored? Would it be stored on Lugnet and linked to by the newsgroup resources? Would it be stored on ldraw.org and linked to by the OMR itself? I think the more appropriate place is (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
| (...) Enh...you're probably right. But we could at least have .system and .technic to separate those?? (...) Ok, so what do you think about the group thing? I think its a good idea and would be a nice place to cumulate models of such type. It is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
