 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | (...) Don, I thought about this for a while and have decided to retract my positive swing on this. The whole, dat required or not discussion is somewhat moot IMHO. For a given complete physical model there are only so many reasonable ways the model (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I think you really are on to something now... The various instruction creator/authors all have their own styles, although some authors are similar in some areas to some other authors, you still can often tell who did which instructions if (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | | | (...) I agree. I also percieve this as a great catalyst for invention of new techniques and styles. (...) Raising the bar is a good thing. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) I second Lar, this is a great idea, Kevin. I'm excited that the topic of Building Instructions has gained popularity over the last year or so, with the release of LPub, launch of BIPortal, etc. This contest could serve to further promote the (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Ouch! That hurts. Did you bump your head or something? (...) I think you're missing the point. With an LDR file I can move the arms and legs of a Mech to see what it looks like in different poses. I can spin the gears of a robot even if I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) Actually Don, I agree with all those points and am in favor of authors having the option to post their DAT/LDR/MPD files along with the images. My point is that within the scope of a completed model, having a contest on how the model is (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I got the point, but I'm not completely convinced. Anyhow, I really only suggested the LDRotM contest because I'm afraid the model sellers might be influential enough to eliminate even the *option* of publishing the LDR files in the MotM (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) irrelevent. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
