 | | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Hi Jeremy! Yours was one of the names that I figured just wasn't getting through due to something silly like this. I also figured that you'd come through and approve the new agreement so that the parts you created could continue to be (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Posting setup (was Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Yes, if you are a member and you are signed in, as in that case you can be configured so that you do not get the confirmation email, your posts are accepted as is, with the email as configured the last time you went through posting setup (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Now I'm confused. How do you post if the email is invalid? Confirmation email for every post goes to the email address attached to the (possibly spam-blocked) email you list in each post. If the address isn't valid, you don't get the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Because you hadn't yet went to the URL I pointed to, and/or no human had yet approved it. Reminder, this is it: (URL) and you should remember, there will be a lag, a human has to look at it and decide if it's valid. (...) Here's a hint back, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) I second this. For some reason, Lugnet isn't using my updated email address in my new posts. (Here's a hint: SPROAT.US is gone, SPROAT.NET works.) The ONLY reason I even knew of this thread is because I went ego-surfing on Lugnet today. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For example: (URL) (just the one I picked off the top of my head) Those people that are getting mail but ignoring Orion... why? This is important. The impact to the entire community will be somewhat negative, we may have to run with two (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For all the asterisked people, yes. This is how I found the bulk majority of the people whose email was unknown. Also, some of the people on the list are still posting here on Lugnet but for whatever reason have not contacted me. This is why I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Just wondering if you've tried a Google search using their name (e.g. "Jeff Findley") to see if you can find a new email address. Thanks, Jeff (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
It's been a month and a half since the LDraw.org Steering Committee announced the LDraw.org Contributor Agreement. The response has been overwhelming with may positive comments and many old time authors contacting us with their support. We currently (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) And that's a good thing. Come on now. The whole ldraw library is a derivative work and we've already lost contact with the original author, and many subsequent part authors, but they still get credit for a job well done. Good work! Keep it up! (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) ... but not without acknowledging those works as yours. (...) Chris (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) Among other things, yes. (...) Also that. Jacob (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) Basically the all this CA is telling you is that you need to agree to release your part under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence for us to accept your part for distribution. The Creative Common Organization is kind enough to provide a (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) For example: "The right to create derivative works of the Work" Does that mean altering the works (in this case: editing my dat files and make updates on them) without trying to contact me first? Or does it just mean works that uses my works? (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I have to decline. Maybe next year. Thanks for the nomination though! /Tore (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Just to clear up a bit of confusion. This nomination is for the Ldraw.org Steering Committee (SteerCo) and not for the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC). The difference is the SteerCo is responsible for the overall governence of LDraw.org (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks, Ross and Timothy, for this (unexpected) nomination. I must decline though because of lack of time. Maybe next time, having a LeoCAD user at the LSC would be nice... Philo (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
(...) As an admin I will handle the renumbering of ####.dat to ####b.dat, but only if it is brought to my attention. At present I do not get automatically notified of all holds, but this is an enhancement I am working on. Please indicate (either (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
(...) Relatedly... 1) The only part I've uploaded thus far, a ####a, got a hold vote because it'd require moving the existing #### to ####b (with a ~Moved) file. Is this a valid reason to hold, or something the admin would do if it got approved? I'd (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
hi, would it be possible to add a second queue to the PT, listing just parts with a hold vote to have an overview how long they are already hang around there? it would be easier to sort out the orphans. w. (20 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
