 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Agreed. -Tim (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I still would like to respect the author's choice not to have the raw DAT code posted, it is after all his/her property. -Orion (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I think this analogy is not so great. The reason why we can't take things home from a museum is that things there are unique and in a museum more people can come see it. In the virtual world it's rather the other way around: things are not (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) While I was at work, I thought of another great reason to switch to DAT code enties: instructions on how to build the model can be made available if the auther allows. There are quite a few MOTM entries that I'd love to build but can't because (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) It not so much that models are winning because they're rendered better, it's that I feel some entries are being overlooked because they look "worse". To me, this seems unfair to the beginner who, while having great modelling ideas, hasn't yet (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) While I understand the desire to have all models publicly available, I respect the authors desire to keep his/her efforts out of the public domain. A great analogy of this is that you can go a museum and look at an exhibit, you can even take (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
hello all, My compliments to Orion and his efforts to make the MOTM contest more fair. But I do wonder why there is a need for this. Have there been doubtful submissions in the past? My biggest puzzle however is the copyight issue. Steve, in reply (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) If you want to focus on presentation, then Scene is the contest for you, that's the idea behind this idea. Leveling the playing field via automation encourages everyone to focus on the model. We DON'T want someone to win because they had (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) clip (...) I can understand your concern as to shift the focus more towards the modeling side of the process, yet am concerned that it seems as if the rendering process will be come almost an afterthought if your suggestions are followed. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Just to point out - this discussion is only about the Model of the Month. The Scene of the Month contest would not be change. This would help sharpen focus of MOTM on the actual LDraw model, and SOTM would focus on composition, rendering (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) One minor thing. L3P's default view that most people are used to is equivalent to -cg30,45,0. I really think the latitude of 30 is preferable to the latitude of 45 for most models. --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
After formal running the MOTM contest for a month, I've becomed concerned with the fairness of the contest. In response to my concerns, I'd like to make the following changes to the rules for MOTM in order to level the playing field. - All (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 30 Dec 2003
|
|
Section Totals 118 certified files. 223 files need admin review. 519 files need more votes. 500 have uncertified subfiles. 151 held files. Total Files: 1,511 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-30: 118 / 223 / 519 / 500 / 151 (1,511) 2003-12-22: (...) (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 22 Dec. 2003
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 071 certified files. 235 files need admin review. 458 files need more votes. 520 have uncertified subfiles. 157 held files. Total Files: 1,441 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-22: 071 / 235 / 458 / 520 / 157 (1,441) (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 15 Dec. 2003
|
|
Sorry, not quite awake yet. Today's the fifteenth; Wednesday will be the seventeenth... :P ~~~ (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 17 Dec. 2003
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 063 certified files. 238 files need admin review. 447 files need more votes. 522 have uncertified subfiles. 157 held files. Total Files: 1,457 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-17: 063 / 238 / 447 / 522 / 157 (1,457) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 10 December 2003
|
|
(...) Ya but this one is a good direction.. more certified, less need review, less need more votes. The next parts update should be a nice one! (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 10 December 2003
|
|
It keeps growing... and growing... and growing... ;-) Stats for Unofficial Files 365 certified files. 224 files need admin review. 402 files need more votes. 558 have uncertified subfiles. 174 held files. Total Files: 1,723 Comparison with Prev. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Thanks. It works now. A (21 years ago, 8-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) You have to give the system some time for your newly registered account to be filtered throughout all the site's modules. Log out, wait 30 minutes, log in, and try again. You should now be able to vote. -Orion (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
