|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.743)
|
|
 | | Ldraw to Bricklink shopping list converter
|
| Hi, want to quickly search Bricklink for parts in your Ldraw creation? check (URL): just upload your Ldraw file, and you'll get a complete list of links to Bricklink search pages. Let me know how you like this tool, and make sure you try the MLCad (...) (19 years ago, 26-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.743)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) But as I said, if you put all instances, that need to be named, in a subfile of its own you *have* named instances. It wouldn't be too difficult to write a helper program (or add-on) that does this folding for you (creating a subfile of (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.743)
|
|
| | LDraw.org down?
|
| Visiting LDraw.org at 2:20 pm CET gives: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: themes_get_language() in /usr/www/users/peero.../theme.php on line 49 (19 years ago, 10-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| One more thing I forgot to mention: I am a lowsy programmer, so don't judge the LDA project by looking at its interface. It it primarly for testing my theories to see if they work. Just like I don't think anyone uses original LDraw anymore, I really (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) Ha, ha, ha.... I had this long winded response argument all typed out, and then Mozilla died. Probably divine intervention. Let me try and see if I can get this one out with less energy. According to this specification: (URL) provides two (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) I really should write a part 2.... Basically, it involves converting the model to povray (or whatever, blender even). If the conversion process retains the parent-child hierarchy, then you don't have to go into the converted code and 1) add (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote: <snip> (...) Too true! (...) How about 3d modeling Parent->Child relationships When the Parent part moves, All children move in relation to it, including rotation (Unless they are Tracking to another (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation [DAT]
|
| (...) This is the way LDA2001/2005 already works on the inside. Here's a temporary object file, created by LDA2005, before it is inlined into its parent and grandparent files and, after that, deleted: 0 Project=MyAn; Frame #000; (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) Yes, this is what Anders was trying to get me to understand. The MPD framework provides a name visibility barrier (scope). I still say that LDraw type 1 lines are used to specify hierarchy. The <file> names within the MPD can be used to (...) (19 years ago, 27-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation [DAT]
|
| (...) Um, I'm not sure this has been worked out... I think James was saying that the subfiles in an MPD can be treated as the 'name'. This is true, as long as you also require that each subfile only be used once. So a file like: 0 FILE test1.mpd 1 (...) (19 years ago, 27-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation [DAT]
|
| (...) Yes, this is exactly what I suggest in my tutorial on how to model stuff. Then, in test1.mpd, you can rotate block1, and it will rotate all of its children as well! And you *should* rotate block1 so that you can see if you got its rotation (...) (19 years ago, 29-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) Except me. ;) Seriously, this is why I butt into animation discussions. I care so much I want other people to at least come up with something that will survive time. I don't want someone to create something that will be incompatible with what (...) (19 years ago, 29-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) Yes, but you can give the 'files' any name you want inside the MPD. They don't *have* to match the part name outside of the MPD. So you *can* get named parts inside an MPD (with the help of a suitable 'post-processing' program). I certainly (...) (19 years ago, 27-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) I guess I was not even considering STEP, ROTSTEP or CLEAR as meaningful for animation. I was only really considering type 1 lines as useful, just to describe the models components, so we agree. I was thinking about a higher level scripting (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.742)
|
