|
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what qualification someone (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) That was the intent of the minimum requirements. I'd like this to be as open as possible too, without risking the integrity and competency of the decision making body by allowing someone to walk in off the street and get in. (...) Yep. I'm (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I'm sorry for the confusion here - Lar corrected me offline on the definition of 'subcommittee' (which technically typically means members drawn from the parent body [1], not the intent here). I didn't mean to imply that the 4+1/steering (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) right. I was saying that the LSC needs to be qualified (as Orion pointed out), AND that the LSC needs more representation from the programmers. Currently, as far as I can tell, it has (from the stats I could gather): Jacob: parts author, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I think this looks very comprehensive - and I think the idea of choosing a small group of dedicated people to actually take the proposal forward is the way to go. I think this proposal is definitely a step in the right direction. ROSCO (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Right. (...) I'm not sure here. If we make those requirements guidelines, it further weakens the LSC. BUT, as duly noted, we have two cases who could qualify, Dwayne and Wayne. I wouldn't want them excluded from the possibility of being LSC (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Yep, I agree 100%. Tomorrow I'm going to work on an 0.7 draft version of the proposal, taking in the useful comments made by all. It should tighten it up considerably from 0.6, eliminate the confusion, and add stuff like Wayne's recommendation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Moving LDraw.org permanently to Peeron?
|
| What does people think about moving LDraw.org permanently to Peeron? I have discussed the problem a bit with Dan and Jennifer and they seem to be positive towards the idea, as long as we can distribute the heavy traffic (downloading the complete (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) formats. (...) ... (...) I interpret the "set in stone" statement to refer to the language as defined in 027 version of LDraw/LEdit. It is my belief that all the nuances (nucances :^) you mentioned should be described in the 0.27 document. The (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I guess I'm worried about the LSC defining a standard that has no meaning. Without the community accepting the standard, what's the point in having it defined? I do agree with later posts, especially wayne's - the vote is likely to become a (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.842)
|
