Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:53:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
884 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:00:20PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > > -Served as a reviwer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official parts
> > > updates and have posted least 5 reviews per update
> > >
> > > This ensures that the candidate has activly served as a reviewer and is not
> > > just somebody who happens to have reviewer access
> >
> > I agree, 100%. I think we should have more representation from the
> > programming side of the community.
>
> Right. The proposal is set up in such a way to encourage everyone -
> programmer or not - to discuss the issues publicly. When it comes to making
> decisions, a limited group of qualified people (in this case, programmers,
> parts authors, or reviewers) to actually cast the vote to create an
> LDraw.org standard. Naturally, the LSC members would be expected and
> encouraged to participate in the public discussion, but they're the ones who
> make the decision.
I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out
those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have
proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what
qualification someone must have in order to be declared competent but I
think the reqs as they stand are good enough, with or without my suggestion.
> I suppose whether the LSC private list is publicly viewable or not is
> something else up for debate - on one hand, transparency is a good thing, on
> the other, it would be nice for them to have a forum where they don't have
> to be politically correct.
I'm am not and will never be "polically correct". I say keep the list open.
If someone has a personal beef with anyone in the LSC then they can take the
courteous path of private Email discussion not via the public forum. The
public boards are no place for attacks on a persons character or ability.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) That was the intent of the minimum requirements. I'd like this to be as open as possible too, without risking the integrity and competency of the decision making body by allowing someone to walk in off the street and get in. (...) Yep. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Right. The proposal is set up in such a way to encourage everyone - programmer or not - to discuss the issues publicly. When it comes to making decisions, a limited group of qualified people (in this case, programmers, parts authors, or (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
