Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:00:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
795 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm going to snip out the stuff I'm not going to comment on
> Another thing to note: The "LDraw" file format is set in stone, and it is
> whatever LDraw/LEdit can use. The "LDraw.org" file format is extensible, and
> based upon meta-commands. The goal here is to form a direction for the
> extension of the LDraw.org file format, and define future standards and >formats.
I like this distiction. Now we can concentrate on forging a new path
without having to worry about legacy DOS programs
> Requirements for Membership
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members
> of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements:
>
> - Authored an LDraw part subsequently released in an Official LDraw.org
> Parts Update
> - Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official
> parts updates
> - Authored a software program that is compliant with either the LDraw 0.2.7
> spec or another spec published by the LSC
I like this idea of having qualified members. You are definately qualified
if you have one or more parts certified or you write a program but I think
that the reviwer req needs some further clarification. My suggestion is this:
-Served as a reviwer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official parts
updates and have posted least 5 reviews per update
This ensures that the candidate has activly served as a reviewer and is not
just somebody who happens to have reviewer access
> Elections
> ~~~~~~~~~
> The LDraw.org Members eligible for LSC membership will vote on the nominees
> by privately listing the five (5) nominees they select for the position.
> Votes will be received and tallied by the LDraw.org leadership, who will be
> accountable to each other for accuracy. The 1st LSC will consist of no more
> than 5 people, however the LSC will be able to create vacant seats to be
> filled at a future election if they wish.
I assumes votes will be handled by Email to a special email address at
LDraw.org?
All and all I think this is a very well formed document. I would accept it
even without the change I suggested. Hopefully we can get this machine
rolling in the right direction.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
14 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
