|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| [snip] (...) Tim: For those who do not know, W3C stands for World Wide Web Consortium and it is the organization that is responsible for web standards such as HTTP, URL, HTML, XML, etc. Before I get into the details of how W3C operates, let me start (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| This thread has grown so much since Friday it's hard to know exactly where to interject.... so I just picked a spot. I'll have more to say later after reading the thread again but wanted to throw a few comments out. (...) YES! Exactly. And one could (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) I think you picked a great spot to come in at. (...) Yep: format evolution = good. (...) Good idea. I'd also like to add that such a standards body should be relatively few in number. Not to be exclusionary, but to maintain focus. The number 7 (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | LDraw file spec
|
| In light of recent discussion, I'm working on a consolidated file spec. Basically my aim is to combined the original spec with the 'Official' additions and mention the other additions and where to find definitions. The 'Official' group: The original (...) (22 years ago, 16-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| Ok...replying to myself here... (...) Also, Wayne, since we're on the topic of standards bodies, would you mind sharing with the community some of your thoughts about this, based on your past term(s) as Sun's representative to the W3C? Guys - (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) Excellent suggestion, Wayne. (...) I like this - with one reservation. We should only focus on documenting 1.0.0 right now. Additions, which would go in a future version (1.1.0) are being openly discussed. Actual decisions on that version (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| GREAT input Wayne. (now, can we twist Wayne's arm to be on the SC?) Yes, we should learn from orgs but not adopt everything. The proper balance is key. What follows is some ILTCO organizing committee experience. On the topic of conference calls, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) I'm not so keen on actual phone use (all I have is a cell phone), but using AIM, MSN, ICQ etc... is propbably the best way. (...) Due to my work, it's would be easier for me if we did this during or after a lego event. It's easier for me to (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) Definitely. I think it's important to draw from ILTCO's experience forming as well as Wayne's experience on the W3C. (...) Good idea. While I'm not going for a position on the SB myself, I can attest for the value of voice conversations over (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) I wasn't too enthusiastic about conference calls when I first heard W3C talk about them. They kind of grew on me as I saw how effective they were. We could resolve in 5 minutes an issue that would otherwise take days of elapsed time and hours (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| Hi All, Wow! This thread has created more postings that I thought it would. So far I've gathered meta-commands from (URL) Eriksson LTrax, Parent: Kevin Clague - LPub and LSynth There must be more. If you know of programs that define their own (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community. The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to be the LSC. It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the nominees (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.846) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.845) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.845) |
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Why not? ldraw.org would presumably be (by Bylaws provision) banned from selling the info, and would presumably be bound to take all reasonable care with the information. Those restrictions (which would take a lot of work to ever change, by (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.845) |
|
| | Part request: TV Chopper Windscreen
|
| This part from year 1999 is unfortunately not availible for LDraw: (URL) the range of windscreen-elements is limited anyway, I feel this could make a useful addition. Shouldn't be overly hard to create for a skilled parts-developer. Any takers? (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.845) |