|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
 | | Re: Proposal
|
| (...) Erg. The .DAT extension is pretty much needed by all tools in use. And the original tools are still used quite a bit, especially in cases where tool flexability is more important than a GUI. (i.e. I still use LEdit to model tank treads, since (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
| | Unofficial Update Progress
|
| I am working on an 'unofficial update' page. Just to have a handle for it, I'm labeling it 'update 2001-01', although after update 2001-02, the unofficial update will go away, cease to exist, become as though it never was. Some things that I am (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.915)
|
|
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| (...) Hmmm. Maybe you're right, for the short term. But putting Unofficial on the front of the name makes it clear for everyone. Most people wouldn't know what the @-sign means. Long-term, I want to use this 'unofficial release' page as (at least) a (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| OK, you asked for it, and now you've got it. I've preposted an "Unofficial Update" page at: (URL) There are no links to this page yet, so it's not officially unofficially released. Anyway, take a look, tell me what you think. The good news: I (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
| (...) I'll go look up the discussion. I'm just getting back into the swing of things. I think CVS would be a great way of distributing the parts. There's clearly some managment tools needed to help with organizing the submissions and reviews of new (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| (...) OK. I took care of these two very minor issues. ;) I won't vouch for the quality of any of the linked data, though! The first part I pulled down had a half-dozen lines with syntax errors. :O Remember, that URL is (URL) Steve (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:92sfftk3sqrfi3d...4ax.com... (...) name - (...) to (...) 'Unofficial' to (...) I thought it might be something like that. (...) keep a (...) The Unofficial is going to make it hard to find (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
| "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| | Re: Demo of part manipulation in isometric view
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:GD4oE6.82s@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) the (...) it. Yes, I'm planning to allow at the very minimum, the ability to view any of the eight potential isometric views (if you made a model of a (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.914)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.913)
|
|
| | MOTM Parameters question
|
| Is there any requirement that LDraw/rendered submissions use only "official" part/color combination, or that they use only "official" LCad DAT parts? I wouldn't presume to submit any clone parts, of course, but there are some canonical parts, such (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.913)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.913)
|
|
| | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
| (...) The main advantage would be saving a few bytes of file space. Which is most significant to the download process, since we've got about 3MB of data, between ldraw.exe and complete.exe. The rendering time would be *mostly* unaffected. On the on (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.913)
|
