|
 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I would be one of those who would be prevented from voting (at least this year), and I don't have a strong objection to not being able to vote. The restriction is designed to make the LSC a technical group voted on by technically involved (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I got friends. I therefore got lots of drivers licenses :-) (...) Obviously I'll have to show up in person at 1 Ldraw Plaza to submit some DNA :-) (...) Humor? And to demonstrate that creating multiple means of verification may defeat the (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I think you're misunderstanding, perhaps I wasn't clear enough in the proposal. The leaders who set up the LSC are only setting it up, they aren't the initial members of the LSC. These people were self-selected two years ago, based on the fact (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) All: I'm little behind the curve on this overall discussion, but I think I can speak to this issue. I think the proposed rules for LSC inclusion are quite reasonable. My reading of the rules is that I do not qualify for LSC membership (and I (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) look at Amy's post, and what she pointed out. For making sure each member is unique, the list (that I snipped) doesn't help. But I suggest we move on anyway, and just require a unique working email address for now. We can try to think of other (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Hi Todd - In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Todd Lehman writes: [...] (...) The systems you outlined above sound cool. It would be great if this could help with verifying people based on LUGNET member ID's. -Tim PS - are you by chance switching over to (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | JDraw3D, another Viewer/Editor for ldraw files
|
| Hello All, It's my first time posting here, but I just didn't know how to show to the public my program, a 3d viewer / editor for LDraw files. Please let me know what you think about it. It is written entirely in java, so it should be ready to run (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Great, thanks! Ultimately, the means of communication should be up to the elected LSC members to decide for themselves. If I had my say, I like the idea of a mailing list on LDraw.org, which posts messages automatically to a LUGNET group for (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Hi Anders - (...) This verification discussion was based on the assertion in the thread that proving a unique identity to prevent vote spoofing was important. So, the suggestions made were proportioal to the concern expressed. That said, seeing that (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: JDraw3D, another Viewer/Editor for ldraw files
|
| (...) ... Hi Florin: Somehow I missed the Java 3D part of the installation. There are two choices, DirectX and OpenGL. The DirectX couldn't find a suitable driver on my system, so I installed the OpenGL (presumably software-only) solution. I got (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I guess I'm worried about the LSC defining a standard that has no meaning. Without the community accepting the standard, what's the point in having it defined? I do agree with later posts, especially wayne's - the vote is likely to become a (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) just a few thoughts: * the LSC is a technical body * the new file format worked out by the LSC will effect the work of part-authors and programmers. conclusion: * honestly I can't see a reason why people who have never authored a part or wrote (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) That's okay. I recognized that pretty quickly. Organizations need long term visions as well as short term. Hopefully the short term solution easily transitions into the long term stable solution. Otherwise, we may be seeing this same sort of (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Yep, I agree 100%. Tomorrow I'm going to work on an 0.7 draft version of the proposal, taking in the useful comments made by all. It should tighten it up considerably from 0.6, eliminate the confusion, and add stuff like Wayne's recommendation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.312)
|
