|
 | | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) I'm not so keen on actual phone use (all I have is a cell phone), but using AIM, MSN, ICQ etc... is propbably the best way. (...) Due to my work, it's would be easier for me if we did this during or after a lego event. It's easier for me to (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) Definitely. I think it's important to draw from ILTCO's experience forming as well as Wayne's experience on the W3C. (...) Good idea. While I'm not going for a position on the SB myself, I can attest for the value of voice conversations over (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
|
| (...) I wasn't too enthusiastic about conference calls when I first heard W3C talk about them. They kind of grew on me as I saw how effective they were. We could resolve in 5 minutes an issue that would otherwise take days of elapsed time and hours (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw File Format Standard Committee Update
|
| Hi Orion - I have a written proposal which covers the process for starting the standards committee, and the process for perpetuating it. It's almost ready to be posted to the public for comments. I put this together with the help of Kevin, Larry, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) <snip> This is great stuff. Thanks, Tim for pushing this forward, others contributed, but you certainly did a great job including everyone's comments and pulling together a cogent draft proposal for the LSC. I plan to stand for election to it (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Thanks, Kevin. I'd like to see some good discussion on this here before moving on it. Does anyone have any comments, concerns? (...) Thanks! I couldn't have put that together without you, the others we were mailing with, and the community (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what qualification someone (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) That was the intent of the minimum requirements. I'd like this to be as open as possible too, without risking the integrity and competency of the decision making body by allowing someone to walk in off the street and get in. (...) Yep. I'm (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) right. I was saying that the LSC needs to be qualified (as Orion pointed out), AND that the LSC needs more representation from the programmers. Currently, as far as I can tell, it has (from the stats I could gather): Jacob: parts author, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I think this looks very comprehensive - and I think the idea of choosing a small group of dedicated people to actually take the proposal forward is the way to go. I think this proposal is definitely a step in the right direction. ROSCO (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Right. (...) I'm not sure here. If we make those requirements guidelines, it further weakens the LSC. BUT, as duly noted, we have two cases who could qualify, Dwayne and Wayne. I wouldn't want them excluded from the possibility of being LSC (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
