Subject:
|
Re: Request change to ptreleases.cgi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:10:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1880 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> However, there are actually multiple different perfectly valid heirarchies,
> and for this reason I think the flat list is better overall.
I tend to agree with your thought, and I'm going to switch the script over to a
flat-list model.
Although I think the hierarchy of release -> distr type -> file format makes the
most sense; and (somewhat) addresses your earlier question about the older
updates that are only available as ARJ-EXE files.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Request change to ptreleases.cgi
|
| (...) I actually considered that when you made your original post. However, there are actually multiple different perfectly valid heirarchies, and for this reason I think the flat list is better overall. Here's an example with a different (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
