To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9729
9728  |  9730
Subject: 
Re: Variants of 4.5v train motors
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:33:14 GMT
Viewed: 
2278 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:
I have updated the part names based on this information - to remove the voltage
designation and correct the dimensions.

I'm confused. Are these parts generally openable - are the actual motors
removeable (by the average user)?  If they are removeable, then the (shortcut)
names should include "case", since they aren't actually the motor.

If the motors are not removable, then the c01 files should be "Complete", not
"Shortcut", and the voltage designation should remain.

I think I might also generate two small red/white sub-pseudoparts for the
voltage indication, and include these in the shortcuts to show through the
hole.

If you're going to do that, you might as well put the voltage in the part names
(for the shortcut/complete files).

That way we can have voltage-specific shortcuts (which should help peeron and
bricklink striaghten out thier inventories), without needing to make the
casing voltage-specific.

(showing my lack of knowledge on pre-9V trains) Was the casing used for multiple
voltages?  This thread has only mentioned 4.5V.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Variants of 4.5v train motors
 
(...) Yes, including case is good. As Niels indicated, the 4 x 12 x 3 1/3 versions are openable with a screwdriver, allowing the actual motors to be replaced, so I think the term "Shortcut" is correct. The 4 x 12 x 4 version is glued, so I'll change (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Variants of 4.5v train motors
 
<SNIP> Thanks Niels for taking the time to research this. I have updated the part names based on this information - to remove the voltage designation and correct the dimensions. Regarding your comment "The parts look good, I only miss metal (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

11 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR