Subject:
|
Re: Part Tracker news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Apr 1999 03:34:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
952 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <37057f5d.141041428@lugnet.com>, blisses@worldnet.att.net
(Steve Bliss) wrote:
> The Parts Tracker is completely separate from the actual flow of parts from
> author, to Terry, to voting, to release.
>
> It would be very helpful, at least to one person, to have a more automated
> process for this, but I know Terry personally reviews and cleans up nearly
> every part-file that goes across his inbox.
>
> Steve
Any recommendations on how things could be better integrated? Or do
people feel that the current system works well? I'd especially like to
hear Terry's thoughts -- I'm happy to try and help the voting process
along in any way possible.
Thanks,
-Zach
Zach "The Lego Maniac" Benz
http://www.bigfoot.com/~zbenz/lego.html
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Tracker news
|
| On Sat, 3 Apr 1999 02:18:14 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote: [Big snip] The Parts Tracker is completely separate from the actual flow of parts from author, to Terry, to voting, to release. It would be very helpful, at least to one (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
