To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9652
9651  |  9653
Subject: 
Re: 4.5V Semaphore Signal
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:16:05 GMT
Viewed: 
1725 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
Should I create 4 complete shortcuts for the train signal?

I'd rather you didn't.  The (Complete) and (Shortcut) notations should indicate to
modelers that they can examine the part file for component parts, which they can
incorporate directly into their model.

Since the lever (handle) and blade can't both be rotationally centered, you should
create 2 files - x304c01 as a (Complete) file as either the Stop or Proceed attitude,
and x304c02 is a (Shortcut) with the alternate attitude.

(Red/Blue Stop, Red/Blue Proceed, White/Red Stop, White/Red Proceed)

Use the more common color scheme when you create x304c01 and x304c02.

I came up with another solution for the two common color variants issue, without
having four complete/shortcuts:
Create the shortcuts without the baseplate, as the other parts share the same
color. (all blue or all red)

Thus having three overall parts:
x304 Train Signal Baseplate
x317c01 Train Signal Stop (Shortcut)
x317c02 Train Signal Proceed (Shortcut)

The Shortcuts contain:
x308 ~Train Signal Base (fixed white/red colors)
x316 ~Train Signal Lever (main color)
x317 ~Train Signal Pole Half (main color)
x318 Train Signal Plate (main color)
s\317s01 ~Train Signal Metal Bar (metal color)

The shortcuts share the same origin as the baseplate.
As the shortcuts don't include the baseplate anymore, I used the partnumber for
the half pole als the partnumber for the shortcuts.

Now anyone can create all four variants (two color schemes, both stop and
proceed) very easy.

How about this solution?

Niels



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 4.5V Semaphore Signal
 
(...) On the real parts, do the poles separate from the baseplates? If they do separate, then this is a good solution. If they don't separate, then this isn't such a good solution -- the 'complete' part file should be just like the part you'd pull (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Need partnumbers and some partnames
 
(...) x389.dat Technic Brick 1 x 2 with Hole and Thin Top x290.dat Magnet Holder for Train Base 6 x 22 Type I x303.dat Train Base 6 x 22 with Cutout Type I x303c01.dat Train Base 6 x 22 with Cutout Type I with Magnets (Complete) x304c01.dat ~Train (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR