Subject:
|
Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Apr 1999 17:56:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
805 times
|
| |
|
|
Terry K wrote:
<something about running out of "temporary" 3-digit part numbers>
How about using 4-digits with an "X" or something similar in front?
--
Patrick Sayre-Little | "Someday we'll look back on all this
wsayreli@polymail.calpoly.edu | and we'll run into a parked car."
http://www.calpoly.edu/~wsayreli | -anonymous
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long)
|
| (...) It would more likely be that we use 3-digit numbers with some kind of modifier. As 3-digits are already established as being temporary. I believe that using any four digit numbers, with or without some modifier, would not be wise. -- Terry K (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New guidelines on parts and numbers (long)
|
| (...) Good one. :-) <snipped the rest of the relevant text> Steve's outline appears accurate to me. I _really_ , *REALLY* hope everyone will think this through and see the benefits it brings. And not argue against it from a strictly knee-jerk (...) (26 years ago, 1-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
