 | | Re: Idea for an ldraw related program
|
|
(...) Oh you star, that looks pretty much like what I need without hacking the program :-) I got it to produce a png, (I now know how part of your hard disc is layed out :-) ), are there any docs for it, I'd like to try to understand the parameters. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea for an ldraw related program
|
|
(...) You could try something like this. ldglite -l3 -a1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1 -s2 -Q -i1 -MS973p65.png 973p65.dat I think that's an example of what what you're looking for, and it comes with source, which should save you some time. Enjoy, Don (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Idea for an ldraw related program
|
|
I'm a user of both Lego CAD programs and the sticker printer program and thought that it might be possible to combine some of the functionality into one program. My Idea ------- With the ldraw parts library you have a large number of patterned (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) that did it. I still had to manually add the -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/pth, but that's ok. coool :) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) Nothing comes to mind right away except maybe the png and zlib header files in the ldglite zip file might conflict with whatever versions you've actually got installed. I originally put them there for the windows build and have been meaning to (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
hmmm. Trying to actually put this into place - we're running into a segfault: ldglite -s.85 -q -i1 -MS3033.png 3033.dat GL_VERSION = 1.4 Mesa 5.0.1 GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_imaging GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_multitexture (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Difficulties in LPub
|
|
Does anyone else have trouble with this? And how does one solve it? Thanks. Jaco "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht news:HFCDFH.Frs@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP open source project: Source code released!
|
|
Hello Don! Thank you.. that was a great hint. Looks much better to me than WinCVS and hasn't that much overhead. I will enjoy ;) Carsten "Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFG6JD.EJD@lugnet.com... (...) ;). (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP open source project: Source code released!
|
|
(...) If it helps any, this CVS client claims to be easier to use for Windows developers. Plus it has a cute mascot. (URL) (21 years ago, 25-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Symmetries other than 16 and 48?
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:8ljscv8fn458bfv...4ax.com... (...) 73071 (...) and (...) of (...) That makes a lot of sense, especially for segments that would not be used by other parts. (...) I guess that would (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDDP open source project: Source code released!
|
|
Hi! I just want everyone to know that I just uploaded the LDraw DesignPad Delphi sourcecode into the CVS branch at (URL) . Please be aware that the sourcecode is offered under the GPL license. Next steps in development will be: - Linux version of (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Symmetries other than 16 and 48?
|
|
(...) For parts with unusual symmetries, I would suggest either (or both): 1. Make a subfile in parts\s with 1 segment of the part, then use that subfile as many times as you need. 2. Find a higher-level symmetry that is common with 16 or 48 (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] Notes for Admins
|
|
Just a quick note for authors & reviewers on the Parts Tracker -- if you need an admin to address something, please email parts@ldraw.org about it -- if you just leave a comment in a review, the admins will only pick up on it by chance. Actually, (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone making part 44224.dat?
|
|
The mating part is refered to as 44225 on both Peeron and Bricklink... Philo (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Symmetries other than 16 and 48?
|
|
What is the general way of handling parts/primitives that have rotational symmetries other than 16 and 48? I am currently looking at reworking 73071 (the old Technic Differential), which has a rotational symmetry of 28, and 3649 (Technic Gear 40 (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
Thanks Don and Paul. I think that pretty much answers my questions for now (but no doubt I will have more later). Now to go fix some of my primitives and parts... --Lance-- (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I'll drop a few quick secrets on how I use conditional lines. First off, I use LDAO and L3lab for the largest amount of part modeling. Usually check occasionally with LDview and Ldraw. So if you are using MLCad, and do not have LDAO, I would (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
(...) Yes. They're needed to render transparent parts correctly. (URL) they're useful for the curve smoothing algorithm in LDview and perhaps other programs. (...) It's often easiest to place the 3rd and 4th points on the corner of an adjacent (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
In reading past posts, it seems that putting in optional lines is encouraged, but I have not been able to find any information on the proper way of using them. First, clearly I use them on outside curves, but I was not able to determine definitively (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
