 | | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) No big deal - no harm done, and it got recertified in time. I just thought it was funny - I didn't think anyone would do anything in the short time I was working. Steve (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Whoops - sorry !! Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] Closed for the Weekend
|
|
I've shut down the Parts Tracker for awhile. You can still look at the data, and get files, but no one can submit parts or post reviews. I expect it will be closed down for most of the weekend, while I finalize LDraw.org Part Update 2001-02. Have a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Errors in certified part 30212 Support Insectoid Leg Large [DAT]
|
|
This part is made of crumbs. Numerous crumbs created by stl2dat. The 2 errors I have found are on the foot. the opposite quad of this quad 4 16 -18.58 16 -92.6 -18.58 12 -92.6 -17.45 12 -90.2 -17.45 16 -90.2 is absent. there is a small gap between (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) One way to get around the publishing emails problem is to provide a link against each vote / comment, which brings up a screen with a message field. When you submit the form, it sends email to the chosen reviewer, with subject "re: LDraw parts (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) You posted it right when I was in the middle of prepping the release! :p So, if someone could look over Chris's file, and post a review of go or no-go, that'd be awesome. Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Damien Guichard writes: <snip> (...) This part now corrected and re-posted to the Parts Tracker. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I agree - I'd rather fix the parts I've submitted - so dont be afraid of pointing out small errors. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Ok I built it and it works. I guess my notes in makefile.linux were incoherent. To build for Mesa versions older than 4.0 you only need to comment out the OFFSCREEN_LIBS line. I guess the Mesa folks broke OSMesa out into a separate library at (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Small bug in certified part 30187 Bike 3 Wheel Motorcycle Body Upper [DAT]
|
|
The imperfection appears below mudguards: this triangle 3 16 20 4 -18 20 .938 -25.391 20 4.308 -26.97 should be 3 16 20 4 -18 20 .938 -25.391 20 4 -26.97 and this triangle 3 16 -20 4.308 -26.97 -20 .938 -25.391 -20 4 -18 should be 3 16 -20 4 -26.97 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) If off-screen rendering is disabled, everything seems to work fine. (...) I think it is 3.4. (...) I have extended the installation instructions, so they (should) handle this problem. (...) Yes "/etc/ld.so.conf" and "ldconfig". (...) (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
|
(...) To expand a little on Dan's reply... The updates to Partsref and Peeron don't happen automatically. They are separate processes, and both require work from the people involved. So they can take a few days (or so...) Also, 2001-01 was the first (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I personally don't mind, but I wouldn't want to speak for anyone else. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) Not at this time. It's been brought up that perhaps the list of reviewers should be made public (although I'm not so sure about publishing their email addresses). Would everyone agree that a list of the names of reviewers should be put up on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I'll second that! Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Yes, I agree. For now, you just have to remember to mark the vote the same as your prior vote. Ideally, there should be a comment area when a new file is submitted, and a separate post-a-comment function. (...) Nod. And we should be able to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Hmm, I'm using 4.0, but it used to compile and link with the older versions. (I just forgot to set up the projection matrix for the offscreen stuff so it didn't work yet in ldglite 0.9.2). At some point (4.0?) the Mesa folks pulled OSMesa out (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
|
(...) I'm just checking the 2001-01 update... btw, why does the search engine on partsref show 2599, but not 2599c01 when I search for "2599" or "flipper"? O.k., the -01 update is in partsref... (...) Nope, none missing... I was just asking to make (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
Hello Jennifer, No.. First i thought that too but it overrides all votes , meaning resetting it. It's a 'great idea for a part, but this is so bad it is not ready for voting' vote. "Jennifer L. Boger" <jenn@peeron.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
