To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6560
  [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
A few notices for you to take note of: 1. I'm planning on cutting a new parts update by the end of the week. This will be the 2001-02 update. If you want to look the parts over now, while there's a chance to fix problems, take a look at the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev) ! 
 
  Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) I have checked all "Certified" parts. However, as a self-restriction, I do not apply "Hold" vote(s) on certified parts. I have no right of veto. I just report. 32184 Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L The beam is single-faced because of (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) Damien - I find your notes on parts *very* helpful, even if you don't want to vote "hold" on them, at least make a note so that such things won't go unnoticed :) I often miss a lot of the smaller details that you've picked up on. Thanks :) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
Hello, I would like to see a 'Comment' entry feature in the part tracker, so you can do comments and questions without voting or resetting the votes. That would be very important. I admit that i overlook details like this too. Another nice feature (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) Yes! I agree that would be really nice! Also, is there a way for authors to get the email of revievers? If a reviewer leaves a comment the author doesn't understand, they need to be able to clarify it. (...) Many hands make light work! ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) I believe that can be done if you're a reviewer by choosing the "novote" option instead of "certify" or "hold" (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
(...) Will the new parts be added to the partsref at lugnet.com, too? The pre-rendered images are very helpful if one searches for parts ;-) It would be nice if the peeron inventory (which links to the partsref ;-) ) would magically show more images (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
(...) I believe the last update _has_ been applied to partsref. Are there missing parts/picturest there? (...) I agree - and it does! the last update has been applied to peeron, and most (if not all) the new pictures were added. Are there any that (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
Hello Jennifer, No.. First i thought that too but it overrides all votes , meaning resetting it. It's a 'great idea for a part, but this is so bad it is not ready for voting' vote. "Jennifer L. Boger" <jenn@peeron.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
(...) I'm just checking the 2001-01 update... btw, why does the search engine on partsref show 2599, but not 2599c01 when I search for "2599" or "flipper"? O.k., the -01 update is in partsref... (...) Nope, none missing... I was just asking to make (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) Yes, I agree. For now, you just have to remember to mark the vote the same as your prior vote. Ideally, there should be a comment area when a new file is submitted, and a separate post-a-comment function. (...) Nod. And we should be able to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) I'll second that! Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
 
(...) Not at this time. It's been brought up that perhaps the list of reviewers should be made public (although I'm not so sure about publishing their email addresses). Would everyone agree that a list of the names of reviewers should be put up on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
 
(...) I personally don't mind, but I wouldn't want to speak for anyone else. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
(...) To expand a little on Dan's reply... The updates to Partsref and Peeron don't happen automatically. They are separate processes, and both require work from the people involved. So they can take a few days (or so...) Also, 2001-01 was the first (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) I agree - I'd rather fix the parts I've submitted - so dont be afraid of pointing out small errors. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Damien Guichard writes: <snip> (...) This part now corrected and re-posted to the Parts Tracker. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) You posted it right when I was in the middle of prepping the release! :p So, if someone could look over Chris's file, and post a review of go or no-go, that'd be awesome. Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
 
(...) One way to get around the publishing emails problem is to provide a link against each vote / comment, which brings up a screen with a message field. When you submit the form, it sends email to the chosen reviewer, with subject "re: LDraw parts (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) Whoops - sorry !! Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
 
(...) No big deal - no harm done, and it got recertified in time. I just thought it was funny - I didn't think anyone would do anything in the short time I was working. Steve (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
 
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
 
(...) Try searching for '2599*' or 'flipper*'. Partsref doesn't do partial-word matches by default. Steve (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR