Subject:
|
Re: Another idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 01:43:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
446 times
|
| |
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatico.deletethisspamblock.ca> wrote in message
news:GHGxC8.5yn@lugnet.com...
> I would prefer developers of new CAD programs use key interfaces
> that make sense, and not ones hamstrung by idiosyncrasies of
> pre-existing software. I'm not saying LEdit's commands are
> good or bad (I wouldn't know, I've only used MLCAD). I'm just
> saying that it makes more sense to come up with an improved
> system, if possible, rather than carry on with a clunky one
> just because some users may already be familiar with it.
> Those people will adapt..., and brand new users will be much
> happier.
Well, the current LEdit key commands I still use consist of the arrow keys, page
up, page down, home, end, I, and A. The ones beginning with the / are for
accessing menus (Windows uses ALT to access the menus at the top). I, for one,
would prefer not to have to adjust to a new key system when the one I know works
just fine. Nothing against someone developing a different standard, but I
always want the LEdit key commands to be there.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Another idea
|
| (...) I would prefer developers of new CAD programs use key interfaces that make sense, and not ones hamstrung by idiosyncrasies of pre-existing software. I'm not saying LEdit's commands are good or bad (I wouldn't know, I've only used MLCAD). I'm (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
