Subject:
|
Re: Technic Axles - go rounded?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:15:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
891 times
|
| |
|
|
blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> But shortening them to more appropriate lengths would be worthwhile.
Are you sure about this? I mean, I don't doubt that the length of the
axles is LDraw is a bit to large, but doesn't this apply to nearly all
parts? Surely a 1x1 brick is smaller than 20LDUx20LDU in real life, to
leave some gap between the bricks when building. But should this be
modeled in LDraw? I don't think so.
Anyway, have you got an updated version of the notched axle #2, Steve
Bliss? One with the correct length, that is. If so, could you post it
on lugnet.cad.dat? I think I want to use it.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Technic Axles - go rounded?
|
| (...) The axles are shorter than bricks. Comparing the 2L axle to a 2x brick, the axle comes up about 1.5 LDU short. I haven't checked the other axles, for now I'm guessing they are also 1.5LDU short. (...) I posted one a few days ago. It was the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technic Axles - go rounded?
|
| (...) Yes, having new axle primitives would make the process go much easier. Perhaps the axle.dat file could be separated into two files: one with the end-lines, and the other with everything else. the "everything else" file would be one of the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
