 | | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Dave Schuler wrote... (...) In P or MODELS. Or inlined in your model DAT file. Or included in your model MPD file. If seams are not desired at all use -sw0.0001 see (URL) a bit uncertain what you mean by SUBparts. I would call the DAT files in PARTS (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:971175476.80878....cci.dk... (...) contained (...) there (...) one (...) to take these things into account. I'm probably going to take rule 2 and recursively apply it up the line to verify (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
(...) I noticed it during a little part authoring, in which I created a file in \parts\s for a bit of the part that was repeated several times within the part. When I render the part in POV-ray via L3P, I notice seams between instances of the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Seams like a problem
|
|
(...) Well, if you set the seams to 0, then you can tell whether the problem is the positioning or L3P's seam calculation... Of course, you can also look through the pov code to see if the scaling which creates the seams is present for each subpart. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Dave Schuler wrote.. (...) Well, I think you have struck a problem in L3P/L3Lab that I have been aware of for quite a while! The problem is when you select a part from PARTS to render/view. The model file (here the part) specified on the command (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Travis Cobbs wrote... (...) Yes, I think it is unncessary. Why would you do that? Besides it would hurt performance. With the current scheme I set a Seamable flag on LT1 references once during input. Then if seams are turned on I can simply test the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:G2AJD0.KAC@lugnet.com... (...) v1.0 (...) and (...) are (...) If you have a part which references a subpart which references another subpart (not likely, true), you don't want to shrink (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:G2AJCw.K6u@lugnet.com... (...) [SNIP] (...) Well, I don't think it's trivial, but it is definitely possible. First grab the path portion of the command line (if there is one; if not just (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
(...) The first time I noticed it was while rendering in POV-ray a part for which the .pov file was generated via L3P. The part consisted of four identical subparts meeting at (0,0,0). I mirrored the subpart in the manner of 8-8sphe.dat, so that the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Lars C. Hassing skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Take a look at 'GetFullPathName' in the Windows API. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Anders Isaksson wrote... (...) Yes, it can help L3Lab, but not L3P which also compiles under Borland Turbo C from 1988 and under Linux. /Lars (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
Travis Cobbs wrote... (...) Agreed - and you have to implement it on all platforms. Thanks for the thorough description. It resembles my thoughts. /Lars (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:G2C98A.50o@lugnet.com... (...) It seems to me that if you change to the directory containing the model (after extracting the directory portion of the filename if present), your only (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Seams like a problem
|
|
(...) Speaking of which, is the Linux version of L3P available? We had a brief email exchange about that subject early in August if you remember ;-) Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
